26.08.2014 00:29, Nikolay Samofatov wrote:
>
> When you converted transaction number from SLONG to TraNumber (ULONG) you
> didn't take into account
> that LCK_query_data returns SLONG and uses signed integers internally.
While there might be different solutions to this particular problem, I'm
wo
26.08.2014 21:52, Jim Starkey wrote:
> As the original author of SLONG, ULONG, et al, might I suggest that you ditch
> them all in favor of the standard and size explicit int64_t, int32_t, etc.?
When it was discussed the last time, some compilers (was it some ancient
MSVC version?) didn't suppo
Dmitry,
AFAIK, since the only user of LCK_query_data with ordering clause is our
transactions management code,
the easiest way to fix this problem is to change lck_data to ULONG everywhere
(and use static_assert to
ensure that sizeof(TraNumber) == sizeof(ULONG) for the moment).
IMO, 64-bitness
