Hello, Dmitry,
are you sure that it is safe to completely ignore subj during commit, such as
I/O errors
or database consistency checks?
--
WBR, SD.
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel
On 02/23/15 13:47, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> On 23/02/2015 07:36, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>> 22.02.2015 20:11, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>>
>>> A solution must be to pass a parameter to destroy methods specifying if
>>> they should release or not the object.
>> Must be ? I don
Hi,
What may be the reason that sweep does not start automatically in FB3 ?
I have sweep interval set to 2, and the difference between OIT/OAT is 4.
When I connect to similar database using FB2.5 I immediately see SWEEPER in
rdb$attachments.
Is it just bug or perhaps it depends on some con
23.02.2015 13:36, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>> A solution must be to pass a parameter to destroy methods specifying if
>> they should release or not the object.
>
> Must be ? I don't think so. I'm not ready to point to correct solution
> right now, but additional parameter is not a solution, as for me.
Incorrect processing of DSQL_drop?
--
Key: CORE-4699
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4699
Project: Firebird Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: API / Client Library
Affects Versions:
Hello, All.
Are options for CREATE/ALTER SEQUENCE clause have to be position-fixed by
standard or
it is allowed to write "CREATE SEQUENCE aaa INCREMENT BY 222 START WITH 666"?
--
WBR, SD.
--
Dive into the Wor
25.02.2015 16:20, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> IObject* obj = ...
> ...
> obj->something(status); // success
> ...
> obj->destroy(status); // detach / commit / cancel / etc
> ...
> obj->something(status); // returns "bad handle" error
> ...
> obj->release(); // destroys the object (if use_count reaches
25.02.2015 18:55, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>
> Are options for CREATE/ALTER SEQUENCE clause have to be position-fixed by
> standard or
> it is allowed to write "CREATE SEQUENCE aaa INCREMENT BY 222 START WITH 666"?
The standard allows flexible positioning of the clauses.
Dmitry
-
24.02.2015 18:30, Ivan Přenosil wrote:
> Hi,
> What may be the reason that sweep does not start automatically in FB3 ?
> I have sweep interval set to 2, and the difference between OIT/OAT is
> 4.
> When I connect to similar database using FB2.5 I immediately see SWEEPER in
> rdb$attachmen
25.02.2015 23:28, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> make release() the only "destroy method"
And what's supposed to do for e.g. transactions? Commit or rollback?
Besides, "destroy methods" report the status while release() obviously
does not.
Dmitry
---
Sorry. This is decades old technology. A destroy method is utterly
incompatible with reference counting. Logically, it has to be this way.
Anyone who is a passed a pointer is free to keep the pointer by increasing the
reference count but is obligated to release it when finished. It follows t
That's simple. It throws an exception. Or, if you want, it does an automatic
rollback (logically correct, but probably more dangerous).
Jim Starkey
> On Feb 25, 2015, at 4:43 PM, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
>
> 25.02.2015 23:28, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>
>> make release() the only "destroy met
Mistake in GDS_DROP_DATABASE?
-
Key: CORE-4700
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4700
Project: Firebird Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Engine
Affects Versions: 2.5.4
Repor
13 matches
Mail list logo
