Hi *,
I'm trying to read the response for op_batch_exec (op_batch_cs), the
p_batch_cs. But what I'm getting over the wire (using fbclient library) is this
`67 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01`
and I'm confused. Here's what I'm decoding manually:
67 00 00 0
On 12/21/21 12:04, Jiří Činčura wrote:
Hi *,
I'm trying to read the response for op_batch_exec (op_batch_cs), the
p_batch_cs. But what I'm getting over the wire (using fbclient library) is this
`67 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01`
and I'm confused. Here
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote 21.12.2021 12:06:
this I can't explain right now, looks like 3 last 00 got lost somehow
Perhaps you mistakenly used routine for storing INF values which throw away
leading zeros reducing value to minimal necessary number of bytes.
--
WBR, SD.
Fire
On 12/21/21 14:20, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote 21.12.2021 12:06:
this I can't explain right now, looks like 3 last 00 got lost somehow
Perhaps you mistakenly used routine for storing INF values which
throw away leading zeros reducing value to minimal nec
When sending 2 msgs (again, using fbclient.dll), the response is as follows. I
don't understand that either.
67 00 00 00 (obviously operation )
02 00 00 00
02 00 00 00
02 00 00 00
00 00 00 00
00 00 00 01
00 00 00 01
Client library processes it fine, but I'm not sure what's what. I also don't
On 12/21/21 15:46, Jiří Činčura wrote:
When sending 2 msgs (again, using fbclient.dll), the response is as follows. I
don't understand that either.
67 00 00 00 (obviously operation )
02 00 00 00 p_batch_statement
02 00 00 00 p_batch_reccount
02 00 00 00 p_batch_updates
00 00 00 00 p_batch_vector
> Are you sure you've shown me dump correctly? Here must be one more
That's what I see in WireShark.
Could you maybe describe in one or two sentences what the fields in p_batch_cs
mean logically? Especially with regards to options one can send in BPB. It's
difficult to do the decoding of pack
Jiří Činčura wrote 21.12.2021 16:12:
That's what I see in WireShark.
It looks like leading three zero bytes disappeared in the dump somehow. Were
they in a previous packet?
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-
Now I realized what's going on. I started with `67 00 00 00 ...`, yet I forgot
about the leading zeros, it should be `00 00 00 67 00 00 00 ...`. Now it makes
bit more sense.
But still a simple description of fields in p_batch_cs would speed things up
for me greatly.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
https
On 12/21/21 18:48, Jiří Činčura wrote:
Now I realized what's going on. I started with `67 00 00 00 ...`, yet I forgot
about the leading zeros, it should be `00 00 00 67 00 00 00 ...`. Now it makes
bit more sense.
But still a simple description of fields in p_batch_cs would speed things up
for
On 12/21/21 18:12, Jiří Činčura wrote:
Are you sure you've shown me dump correctly? Here must be one more
That's what I see in WireShark.
Could you maybe describe in one or two sentences what the fields in p_batch_cs
mean logically?
typedef struct p_batch_cs // completion state
11 matches
Mail list logo
