How difficult would it be to get the user password to the encryption /
key holder plugin, especially for an embedded connection? If possible
at all, would this require new authentication plugin or key holder
plugin or both?
Applications using embedded connections would benefit most from
database
> From: Alex Peshkoff
> Subject: Re: [Firebird-devel] User password for encryption
> To: firebird-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID: <571e0924.3010...@mail.ru>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>
> On 04/25/2016 11:28 AM, Emil To
The question remained unanswered in firebird-support, so I am trying it
here. Basically I'm asking how can a client connect via XNET to a firebird
server using non-default IpcName, for example "Firebird4".
-- Forwarded message -
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 at 09:30
Subject: XNET and Ipc
I wonder would it be possible to make Firebird 4 work with ODS 12 (Firebird
3) databases?
Before Firebird 3 it was relatively easy to upgrade your Firebird server -
your databases could stay in the old ODS and be upgraded one by one, and it
was easier to go back in case of incompatibilities.
But w
On Fri, 31 May 2019 at 11:49,
wrote:
> On 30.05.2019 18:09, Emil Totev wrote:
> > I wonder would it be possible to make Firebird 4 work with ODS 12
> > (Firebird 3) databases?
> >
> > Before Firebird 3 it was relatively easy to upgrade your Firebird
> > server -
I am happily using Firebird 4 Beta2 to serve transparently both ODS12 and
ODS13 databases, by adding Engine12 to the providers list.
However, when creating a new database either by ISQL's CREATE DATABASE or
gbak -c, the server always uses the first, default provider (if not
overridden in database
I am trying to create a database with 32k page - what am I doing wrong?
Also, is it OK to accept an invalid value and replace it without even a
warning?
ISQL Version: WI-T4.0.0.1963 Firebird 4.0 Beta 2
Use CONNECT or CREATE DATABASE to specify a database
SQL> CREATE DATABASE 'localhost:k:\db\test.
It seems that it is only possible to CAST() from/to boolean as char/varchar
(values 'TRUE' and 'FALSE'), and the same also applies to the new SET BIND
OF BOOLEAN TO type-to.
Is this restricted by the SQL standard? Wouldn't it also make sense to be
able to cast /set bind of booleans to any numeric
: Engine
Affects Versions: 3.0.3, 3.0.2, 3.0.1, 3.0.0
Reporter: Emil Totev
The current role is not passed to the external data source when using 'execute
statement ... on external' without AS USER, PASSWORD and ROLE additions.
This has been acknowledged as a bug and fixed for
Reporter: Emil Totev
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Unable to specify new 32k page size
Key: CORE-6316
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-6316
Project: Firebird Core
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 4.0 Beta 2
Reporter: Emil
11 matches
Mail list logo
