Actually, server makes a lot more sense than client, eg the embedded
engine for clientside datastorage. IMHO you shouldn't connect directly
from a mobile phone to an external databaseserver, it is inefficient and
a lot harder to secure than for example a specific webservice.
I agree with
Am 15. Juli 2012 18:23:55 schrieb Mark Rotteveel
I do know that Roman was already planning to migrate to Subversion
before I joined, so maybe he has additional reasons.
Reasons were:
- same VCS for Firebird (core project uses SVN, some others do as well);
- should be supported by SF.net and
.
Roman Rokytskyy
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint
Without default client charset too, this is a partial solution. Not all
applications are written in Java and .NET.
Sure, but defaulting should not happen in fbclient.dll, but in the FB
access library, IBPP for C++, UIB or whatever components are currently
used in Delphi. AFAIK, Delphi is
The only change is that newly created databases are created with some
meaningful charset, not with raw data. The rest remains as it is now -
those that want to manage it already, will be able to do this.
In this case why to configure the default? Let's hardcode it to UTF-8!
Yes, increase
I can't understand the objection. The only think that I do see here
are objections without explaining why. Why such type of features will
be bad ?
Why time based data manipulation are not good for databases but should
be external ?
Don't get me wrong, if I'll understand why, I will write
Look at isc_prepare_transaction2() API. It could attach *any*
application-specific
message to the local transaction before actual commit. TM could pass XID +
something
to identify this part of distributed transaction into
isc_prepare_transaction and later read
this info back from
Jim,
Would it be possible and desirable to have FreePascal as an embedded
stored procedure/trigger language in some future release of Firebird?
(I
can't recall this having been brought up before, so I just start the
ball rolling).
I did not check the current state of Java plugin, but
Oh, so you have implemented a proper security manager for the Java
ESPs? You are great man! :)
It was difficult and initially was failing only in Linux. But after
changes it worked ok as far as I can test.
Will it accept also a default security manager with java.policy file?
So that admins
