On 04/23/12 23:43, marius adrian popa wrote:
I don't know if 2.1 is compiled with gcc 4.7 yet
As much as possible I try to use for packages on SF that version of
compiler which was used to build initial release. That helps to avoid
possible compatibility issues for people upgrading existing
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:22:45AM +0400, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 04/23/12 23:43, marius adrian popa wrote:
I don't know if 2.1 is compiled with gcc 4.7 yet
As much as possible I try to use for packages on SF that version of
compiler which was used to build initial release. That helps to
On 04/24/12 17:27, Michal Kubecek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:22:45AM +0400, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 04/23/12 23:43, marius adrian popa wrote:
I don't know if 2.1 is compiled with gcc 4.7 yet
As much as possible I try to use for packages on SF that version of
compiler which was used
I don't know if 2.1 is compiled with gcc 4.7 yet
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.suse.opensuse.scm/20834/
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your
