Re: [Firebird-docs] Language Reference

2014-04-24 Thread GR
Hi Paul > Is anybody still actively working on the 2.5 Language Reference We have worked (on english and russian versions), but due to some reasons (including your parallel work on LR and LRU) it was stopped. So if you can finish at least basic version of LR this year it would be better for all

Re: [Firebird-docs] Language Reference

2011-09-27 Thread GR
> as we just did with the LangRef OK, I've already see. We've just misunderstood each other. WBR, GR -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record

Re: [Firebird-docs] Language Reference

2011-09-27 Thread GR
Sorry for being late, but what is advantage of putting files in a separate folders ? WBR, GR -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application perf

Re: [Firebird-docs] Our use of CVS

2011-07-15 Thread GR
> I'm sure they could, but, under(wo)manned as we are, > I wouldn't like to invest time in unnecessary changes. > > CVS is far from ideal, but it's more than good enough for our modest workflow. +1 WBR, GR ---

Re: [Firebird-docs] LangRef Update 2.5 ready!

2011-06-13 Thread GR
Hi, Paul > After a huge delay of almost half a year, the Firebird 2.5 LangRef Update is > finally ready! Congratulations and big thanks! WBR, GR -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advan

Re: [Firebird-docs] Introduction.

2011-04-05 Thread GR
Hi, Steve. > What I can do pretty well is proofread and edit "Standard Written English". > ... > Anyway, after a brief discussion with Paul Vinkenoog, he invited me to join > this list and introduce myself, to volunteer my services as an editor of > documentation topics and articles. I have huge