Re: [Firebird-docs] ATTN all committers: B_Release branch created

2012-06-11 Thread Paul Vinkenoog
Hi Norman, > I'm losing my mind! > > I have just discovered a posting entitled 'Checking out the B_Release > Branch' in my archives of the Docs mailing list. It is dated 12th > October 2011 at 09:14. It appears that I wrote it - a full set of > instructions on checking out the B_Release branch.

Re: [Firebird-docs] ATTN all committers: B_Release branch created

2012-06-11 Thread Norman Dunbar
I'm losing my mind! I have just discovered a posting entitled 'Checking out the B_Release Branch' in my archives of the Docs mailing list. It is dated 12th October 2011 at 09:14. It appears that I wrote it - a full set of instructions on checking out the B_Release branch. Sigh! Cheers, Norm.

Re: [Firebird-docs] ATTN all committers: B_Release branch created

2012-06-11 Thread Norman Dunbar
Hi Paul, > OTTOMH: cvs -co manual -r B_Release -- or something like that Close! no hyphen before "co", but: norman@hubble:~/SourceCode/cvs/firebird/manual> cvs co manual -r B_Release Password: cvs server: cannot find module `-r' - ignored cvs server: cannot find module `B_Release' - ignored cvs

Re: [Firebird-docs] ATTN all committers: B_Release branch created

2012-06-11 Thread Paul Vinkenoog
Hi Norman, > >> Now, how do I check out the b_release branch please? > > On the command line: cvs co -r B_Release > The above no longer appears to work: > > norman@hubble:~> cd SourceCode/cvs/firebird/manual/ > norman@hubble:~/SourceCode/cvs/firebird/manual> cvs co -r B_Release > cvs [checkout abo

Re: [Firebird-docs] ATTN all committers: B_Release branch created

2012-06-11 Thread Norman Dunbar
Afternoon all, after a disk tidy and reinstall, I've been recreating all my docs stuff on my laptop. My backup system doesn't back it up as it is quite simple to recreate from cvs. At least, I thought so. I have the web and manual modules recreated and that's fine, but nothing I do will find t

Re: [Firebird-docs] ATTN all committers: B_Release branch created

2011-10-11 Thread Paul Vinkenoog
Hi Norman, >> - The third way is not very subtle, and frowned upon by CVS gurus, but very >> robust (in our case!): You have two working copies like above. You work in >> the first one (the trunk). When you're going to publish, you bluntly copy >> the file(s) in question over their counterparts

Re: [Firebird-docs] ATTN all committers: B_Release branch created

2011-10-11 Thread Norman Dunbar
Hi Paul, I've just updated a number of command line manuals to incorporate Firebird 2.5 and I have committed them to the normal manual module. So far so good! > - If you're fluent in CVS, you can first commit to HEAD, tag the file(s), > then switch your local copy of the file(s) to B_Release,

Re: [Firebird-docs] ATTN all committers: B_Release branch created

2011-07-20 Thread Paul Vinkenoog
Hi all, See the previous message in this thread. There's one little problem left: Currently, everything in B_Release is identical to HEAD (at least as it was yesterday afternoon). Thus, the B_Release branch probably contains some unpublishable documents. I'm checking my own manuals to see if t

[Firebird-docs] ATTN all committers: B_Release branch created

2011-07-20 Thread Paul Vinkenoog
Hi all, If you have write access to the manual module, please read this message carefully. Yesterday, I have created a CVS branch called B_Release. This branch is intended for all the *published* (or at least *buildable and publishable*) revisions of our documents. The idea is that, for most