Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> 4) I don't like how titles of / blocks are rendered,
> they're just italic of the default size. I'd prefer a bigger font (and
> maybe a different colour) as it was in the old version.
I don't think it looks good if notes, warnings and the like have a bigger
font than the
Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> However the rendering of this table is very similar in the old and new
> PDF docs, while in the new HTML it has striping, which it doesn't have
> in the old HTML.
Striping is evil, because it suggests that odd rows are of a different
nature than even rows, which of course
On 11-05-2020 14:44, Paul Vinkenoog wrote:
Mark Rotteveel wrote:
However the rendering of this table is very similar in the old and new
PDF docs, while in the new HTML it has striping, which it doesn't have
in the old HTML.
Striping is evil, because it suggests that odd rows are of a differen
On 11-05-2020 14:30, Paul Vinkenoog wrote:
Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
4) I don't like how titles of / blocks are rendered,
they're just italic of the default size. I'd prefer a bigger font (and
maybe a different colour) as it was in the old version.
I don't think it looks good if notes, warnings
Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> > Striping is evil, because it suggests that odd rows are of a different
> > nature than even rows, which of course they are not. It's also totally
> > unnecessary, because rows are separated by lines.
> >
> > Striping makes tables 'noisy' and less readable. IMO we should d
Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> On 11-05-2020 14:30, Paul Vinkenoog wrote:
> > Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> >
> >> 4) I don't like how titles of / blocks are rendered,
> >> they're just italic of the default size. I'd prefer a bigger font (and
> >> maybe a different colour) as it was in the old version.
> >
