Jeri,The embedded server is unusable currently-- at least in my opinion. Is there no way we can implement the original intent which was to put the fbembed.dll in the application folder. I realize that everyone is volunteer and that I am not able to contribute, but I sure would like to have the em
On 28.7.2006 18:20 Chedalla Vinay K wrote:
> I am able to create databse because my machine.config contains firebird
> provider settings.
> But after deployment, this will not work because end users
> machine.config does not contain firebird provider entries.
If you're using only classes (not so
Title: Using firebird with application blocks
Hi,
I want to use data access application block 2.0 with firebird.
I searched in net, but got some information on application blocks 1.0 but not 2.0.
Could someone provide me related links or articles.
Given below my exact problem.
I a
On 26.7.2006 9:56 Antonio Donia wrote:
> there are problem to download the provider.
> How i do to download it?
>
Are you downloading it from sf?
--
Jiri Cincura
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
-
Hello:
> What features does "Visual Studio 2005 DDEX Provider for Firebird"
> provides?
>
> In other words, Why should I install DDEX provider?
>
Do you need integration inside of the Visual Studio 2005 IDE ??
--
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Vigo-Spain
-
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay
Hi,
What features does "Visual Studio 2005 DDEX Provider for Firebird"
provides?
In other words, Why should I install DDEX provider?
Thanks
Vinay.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net
Hi Dheeraj,
Well I'm not sure about the others, but the Firebird provider is really
intended for use with the Firebird database, or Interbase 6.0 from
which it was originally derived.
I would assume that version of Interbase from 7 up have a different
protocol, to ensure they are differentia
Hi guys,
Eureka! I have implemented the FbMembershipProvider manually along with the
RoleManager thingo and it works a treat. How you wonder? Well it just so
happens that I make use of the CompositeUI Application Block and created a
service wrapping the Fb providers and load them as dependencies
Hi,
Can any one please help in connecting to interbase server 7.0 using Firebird
.net provider in asp.net 2.0. It’s presently giving me an error “connection
rejected by remote interface”. I had changed my machine.config file and
the registry values too. I can see Firebir
thanks it's work fine
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
On 28.7.2006 15:55 Le roy Arnaud wrote:
>> I aslo suggest to perform some code clean up from unneccessary code and add
>> default values to sql scripts.
>
> ok i can begin to add default value into sql script in two weeks.
> else for exemple where do you think that the code would be clean up !
>
> I aslo suggest to perform some code clean up from unneccessary code and add
> default values to sql scripts.
ok i can begin to add default value into sql script in two weeks.
else for exemple where do you think that the code would be clean up !
--
On 28.7.2006 15:52 Le roy Arnaud wrote:
> Hello ,
>
> a little question how i cant catch post_event with fbprovider, i think
> it's with fbremoteevent but i'm not sure anybody can confirm ?
>
static void Main(string[] args)
{
FbConnectionStringBuilder cs = new FbConnectionStringBuilder(
Hello ,
a little question how i cant catch post_event with fbprovider, i think
it's with fbremoteevent but i'm not sure anybody can confirm ?
thanks !
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge
On 28.7.2006 15:44 Le roy Arnaud wrote:
> hello
>
>> Another solutin will be add some default values to table definition, but in
>> code it should be better, right?
>
> i think is better in the table definition
OK, why not.
I aslo suggest to perform some code clean up from unneccessary code an
hello
> Another solutin will be add some default values to table definition, but in
> code it should be better, right?
i think is better in the table definition
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join S
Hello:
> Affirmative. :)
:)
> Supports (ehm, should).
It should and if it doesn't it will be ;)
Fails on connect or running a command ?? I will try to do a test later
today.
--
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Vigo-Spain
-
Take Su
Hi,
there's a problem in FbMemberShipProvider.cs. In CreateUser method isn't
filled IsOnline field. So it crashes.
In my script was domain defined without not null, but on CVS is now with not
null. Probably somebody (I got you Carlos :)) commited not the right version.
But i think, that not nu
Hi,
I have resolved.
the problem is that i have installed version 1 and 2 of .Net.
the solution is to remove references in windows path and specify in the last
row of build.bat the exact path of csc.exe.
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "Carlos Guzmán Álvarez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
20 matches
Mail list logo
