>ok i will correct the script with your modification, and i modify the
>membership_createuser to add the passwordanswer because i forget this
>param.
>> All of my previous complaints have now been resolved, except the web
>> parts profile provider which I will investigate tomorrow as I have
not
Hello:
>
> This seems to load ALL of the rows of each table since when I comment
> out the largest table (orderitems = 1+ million rows) the load time
> becomes much quicker.
>
If you are using a SELECT * FROM TABLE_NAME that is what is should be
doing
you will need to parametrize the query
> Subject: [Firebird-net-provider] slow connection
> I have the relationships set between the tables and the
> controls display the
> correct information, however VERY slowly. The form takes
> several minutes to
> open and is several seconds to change customers.
>
> I do a TableAdapter.Fill for
I realize that I don’t need that
many rows.
I want to narrow down the rows I query to
ONLY the ones for the current order.
I thought I was doing this by setting the
relationship between the two tables, but no.
The question is how do I go about getting
only these rows. Do I have
First off allyou don't need 1 mill records...try to get
olny 100-1000 records.
Users don't need 1 mil records to view!
Regards
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rick RoenSent: Friday, October 13, 2006 5:04 PMTo:
firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.ne
VS.Net 2005 + Firebird 1.5
I’m just learning VB.net and playing with data
connection.
I have a FB database with typical customer->orders->orderitems
relationships
I am doing a test Windows form to display the customer and tables
for their orders and orderitems.
I have the re
>Strange, did you have a single version of the provider installed and
>configured in the machine.config right ??
Usually i get only dlls from http://netprovider.cincura.net/, last time i
got full installation of 2.0.1rc2, so i uninstalled previous version, and
installed the new one.
Registry and
Hi again Carlos,
As Rubén said earlier today, we can't make the provider work with Firebird
2.0. We can now compile, but no way to run it correctly?
Is there anything missing from the CVS? Is it really a fixed problem?
Thanks,
pablo
- Original Message -
From: "Carlos Guzmán Álvarez" <
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez wrote:
> Looks as working i have committed the changes into CVS
OK.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support we
Hello:
> Hi, here's a little changes build config. There's no change in
> functionality. I've only moved build-tests to the higher level (for
> easier night builds) and I've renamed 'build' to 'build-provider' (to
> reflect semantics).
>
> Test it, if it's OK for you and if so, upload it to CVS.
Hello:
> And yes, i use FbProvider ver 2.0.1 RC2
Strange, did you have a single version of the provider installed and
configured in the machine.config right ??
--
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Vigo-Spain
-
Using Tomcat but need
> As a solution we can provide a script with the full database, and separate
> scripts for each provider( without create database statement )
>
I think is a good solution.
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support
Hello:
> Well, maybe there should be at least comment for people, who not want to
> create all tables (don't thinking why).
As a solution we can provide a script with the full database, and separate
scripts for each provider( without create database statement )
--
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Vigo-Sp
Le roy Arnaud wrote:
>> Why all together? When user would create only tables and procedures for
>> RoleProvider, he will just run RoleProvider.sql (for example).
>>
>> If everything will be in one file, he will have to comment some parts and
>> it'S not good, IMHO.
>
> because there are some dep
> Why all together? When user would create only tables and procedures for
> RoleProvider, he will just run RoleProvider.sql (for example).
>
> If everything will be in one file, he will have to comment some parts and
> it'S not good, IMHO.
because there are some dependance between the diferent p
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez a écrit :
> Hello:
>> Carlos, I=92ve sent you a test project some time ago to show you a =
>
>> strange bug I=92ve found.
>>
>> I=92ve sent it to your address at mundo-r. Can you confirm that you =
>
>> received it and tell me if you where able to reproduce ?
>>
> I think i
Le roy Arnaud wrote:
> I think that should be better to make a simple file that create all the
> tables and all stored proc !
Why all together? When user would create only tables and procedures for
RoleProvider, he will just run RoleProvider.sql (for example).
If everything will be in one file,
We have donwloaded again the code and now we can compile, but we get the
same exception:
System.IndexOutOfRangeException: Ãndice fuera de los lÃmites de la matriz.
at FirebirdSql.Data.Common.IscHelper.VaxInteger(Byte[] buffer, Int32
index, Int32 length)
at FirebirdSql.Data.Common.IscHelp
I think that should be better to make a simple file that create all the
tables and all stored proc !
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated tec
> I have finally had time to dig in and figure out what is going on with
> the membership provider. There is nothing wrong with the provider, and
> it seems to be in the database scripts. I found that when the
> MEMBERSHIP_CREATEUSER sp was being called, it was accepting the
> parameters for PASSWO
20 matches
Mail list logo