Re: [Firebird-net-provider] .NET Framework versions

2011-08-13 Thread Γιάννης Μπουρκέλης
Hello Jiri, I think that you should not drop support for .NET 2.0. There are many developers who are using the.NET 2.0 Firebird Provider especially in older projects, including me. .NET 2.0 is not old. It is mature and stable. Applications targeting .NET 2.0 can run on most of Windows XP systems,

[Firebird-net-provider] .NET Framework versions

2011-08-13 Thread Jiri Cincura
Hi *, I'd like to open discussion about versions of .NET Framework we're going to support in 3.0+ versions of .NET provider. 1. I'm strongly thinking about dropping support for .NET 2, because a) it's old, b) the .NET 3.5 doesn't change CLR, just bunch of new stuff, c) upgrade itself is free, d)