Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Bug in FbDataAdapter exception handling

2006-11-10 Thread Andres F. Moschini
>> From: "JCardinal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Bug in FbDataAdapter exception >> handling >> To: [email protected] >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> Which version of the prov

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Bug in FbDataAdapter exception handling

2006-06-08 Thread marzena
g a null reference exception instead of > reporting the non > existant column in an exception and I thought it was fixed. > OK, will send test case today. > Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 18:10:39 +0200 > From: Carlos Guzm?n ?lvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provi

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Bug in FbDataAdapter exception handling

2006-06-07 Thread Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Hello: > The conclusion: > 1) Could you please correct the exception handling in this method in order > to obtain always the correct exception with correct message? > I have committed a change to CVS hope it's correct, let me know if not. > 2) And next - when I found the "correct" message "dataT

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Bug in FbDataAdapter exception handling

2006-06-07 Thread JCardinal
Which version of the provider are you using? I reported a long time ago that it was throwing a null reference exception instead of reporting the non existant column in an exception and I thought it was fixed. ""marzena"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi Carlos, >

[Firebird-net-provider] Bug in FbDataAdapter exception handling

2006-06-07 Thread marzena
Hi Carlos, I've found a bug in the way how exeptions are handled in method FbDataAdapter.Update(DataRow[], DataTableMapping). There is try - catch block and within it are updated parameter values etc. In the "catch" part potential exception is caught but there is no "throw" clause and the program