Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Deploying the provider.

2005-10-31 Thread Julio César Carrascal
Duh! I should had figured it out by myself. I did what you suggested and worked like a charm. Thanks. 2005/10/31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello: > > > No. It has the .NET Framework 2.0 (The RTM version that was > published thursday). > > Alpha 3 is for the Beta 2 of .net 2.0 >

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Deploying the provider.

2005-10-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello: > No. It has the .NET Framework 2.0 (The RTM version that was published thursday). Alpha 3 is for the Beta 2 of .net 2.0 If you want to use it with the .net 2.0 final, get the sources from CVS and build them. -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain --

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Deploying the provider.

2005-10-30 Thread Julio César Carrascal
No. It has the .NET Framework 2.0 (The RTM version that was published thursday). 2005/10/29, Carlos Guzmán Álvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello: > > >Do I have to register the DLL on the GAC? The installer already copies > >the following files to the app's folder: > > > _That machine has the .net

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Deploying the provider.

2005-10-29 Thread Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Hello: Do I have to register the DLL on the GAC? The installer already copies the following files to the app's folder: _That machine has the .net framework 2.0 beta 2 installed ?? -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain --- Th

[Firebird-net-provider] Deploying the provider.

2005-10-28 Thread Julio César Carrascal
I'm using the FirebirdClient ADO.NET 2.0 provider with the embeded server. The installer I'm writing (with NSIS) works flawlesly on my development machine but fails on the test machine with this exception: Declaration referenced in a method implementation cannot be a final method. Type: 'Firebird