I think so
This it´s machine.config
-Mensaje original-
De: Jiri Cincura [mailto:[email protected]]
Enviado el: lunes, 22 de octubre de 2012 10:54
Para: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers
Asunto: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] problems with DDEX and Windoes 8
Does
Does it match machine.config?
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder)
http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Downlo
2012 8:48
Para: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers
Asunto: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] problems with DDEX and Windoes 8
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Félix González wrote:
> It´s compatible DDEX with Windows 8?
Yes.
> I have a problema when I merge FirebirdDDEXProv
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Félix González wrote:
> It´s compatible DDEX with Windows 8?
Yes.
> I have a problema when I merge FirebirdDDEXProvider64.reg for visual studio
> 2010. When I try to add new data source and I clck add new conexión, the
> window close.
FirebirdClient assembly not
Hello
It´s compatible DDEX with Windows 8?
I have a problema when I merge FirebirdDDEXProvider64.reg for visual studio
2010. When I try to add new data source and I clck add new conexión, the
window close.
Thanks
Jiri Cincura wrote:
> The first way with DDEX was only with VS SDK. Then come the way without
> VS SDK.
>
> The functionality is same, but the full is there for historical reasons
> and for people who want to use it.
>
> I don't see any reason to remove it, until we will be 100% sure that
> no
Tri Mardiono wrote:
> My point is, if the both has the same functionalities and same benefits.
> Why should we install the "full" instead "less"?
> With "less" we don't need to have an extra energy for installing n
> downloading VS SDK. I'm still confuse with this :(.
The first way with DDEX was
Jiri Cincura wrote:
> Tri Mardiono wrote:
>> Actually, my question which never be answered to find out, is what the
>> advantages of "full" over "less"?
>
> The "full" requires VS SDK installed; the "less" not.
>
My point is, if the both has the same functionalities and same benefits.
Why shou
Tri Mardiono wrote:
> Actually, my question which never be answered to find out, is what the
> advantages of "full" over "less"?
The "full" requires VS SDK installed; the "less" not.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
Jiri Cincura wrote:
> I don't have experience with packageless, I'm using "full".
>
> Maybe it was the problem.
>
Actually, my question which never be answered to find out, is what the
advantages of "full" over "less"?
Rgds,
TriM
---
Tri Mardiono wrote:
> Well Jiri, I was failed to run DDEX (packageless) when I did the case
> insensitive, but success when I changed to case sensitive. I don't know
> if it's a different with the package?
I don't have experience with packageless, I'm using "full".
Maybe it was the problem.
--
Jiri Cincura wrote:
> Tri Mardiono wrote:
>> Your typo should be FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient.
>
> AFAIK here it's case insensitive.
>
Well Jiri, I was failed to run DDEX (packageless) when I did the case
insensitive, but success when I changed to case sensitive. I don't know
if it's a diff
users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers
Asunto: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Problems with DDEX
Félix González wrote:
> Thanks all for your help
>
> Now DDEX are working, but the only solution was cloning HD from a backup
I`d
> make after install the system
Did you install VS,
Félix González wrote:
> Thanks all for your help
>
> Now DDEX are working, but the only solution was cloning HD from a backup I`d
> make after install the system
Did you install VS, .NET FW etc. from scratch?
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
--
Tri Mardiono wrote:
> Your typo should be FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient.
AFAIK here it's case insensitive.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more?
: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers
Asunto: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Problems with DDEX
Félix González wrote:
> My GAC are
>
> FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
> PublicKeyToken=3750abcc3150b00c, processorArchi
Félix González wrote:
> My GAC are
>
> FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
> PublicKeyToken=3750abcc3150b00c, processorArchitecture=MSIL
> SCHEME: ID: DESCRIPTION :
>
> FirebirdSql.Web.Providers, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
> PublicKeyTok
Hello:
> Dear Jiri,
>
> i have a very detailed article i ever found about DDEX installations. İ am
> confused. Could you confirm that? Because my DDEX is also not working...
> Maybe that solves Felix s problem and mine
>
> http://codemuch.com/node/3
>
Could you give a try using 2.1.0 ??
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jiri Cincura
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 2:17 PM
To: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers
Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Problems with DDEX
Hmmm, seems OK.
Did you get any specific error in i.e. Server Explorer
Hmmm, seems OK.
Did you get any specific error in i.e. Server Explorer?
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, securi
Félix González wrote:
> What is the correct PublicKeyToken? Firebirdsql.data.Firebirdclient? Are
> different in and
In configSections you have (you should have):
type="System.Data.Common.DbProviderConfigurationHandler, System.Data,
Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e0
: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers
Asunto: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Problems with DDEX
So, you have probably wrong info in machine.config or registry.
Check these two places, whether all registry values are correctly
written and also check machine config to match assembly
providers
Asunto: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Problems with DDEX
So, you have probably wrong info in machine.config or registry.
Check these two places, whether all registry values are correctly
written and also check machine config to match assembly signatures to
your GAC installed.
--
Jiri {x2
So, you have probably wrong info in machine.config or registry.
Check these two places, whether all registry values are correctly
written and also check machine config to match assembly signatures to
your GAC installed.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3rename
providers
Asunto: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Problems with DDEX
Félix González wrote:
> I have SDK and I´ve changad machina.config
Are you sure that it's *VS SDK* (it's *not* .NET SDK), 'cause you don't
write anything about this in your first message.
> thanks
>
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de
> Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
> Enviado el: lunes, 05 de febrero de 2007 22:05
> Para: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers
> Asunto: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Problems with DDEX
>
> Hello:
>>
>>
>> I´ve VS20
-provider] Problems with DDEX
Hello:
>
>
> I´ve VS2005 profesional, .NET SDK 2, I´ve instaled FirebirdClient
> 2.0.0 the GAC are OK, I´ve changed FirebirdDDEXprovider.reg and and it
> to registry, but DDEX dosen´t work. Any idea?
>
> If I uninstall all (VS2005, sdk
.) could be
Hello:
>
>
> I´ve VS2005 profesional, .NET SDK 2, I´ve instaled FirebirdClient
> 2.0.0 the GAC are OK, I´ve changed FirebirdDDEXprovider.reg and and it
> to registry, but DDEX dosen´t work. Any idea?
>
> If I uninstall all (VS2005, sdk….) could be work?
>
Please, give a little more of information
Did you have modify machine.config?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Félix González
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 8:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Firebird-net-provider] Problems with DDEX
Hi,
I´ve VS2005 profesional
Félix González wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I´ve VS2005 profesional, .NET SDK 2, I´ve instaled FirebirdClient 2.0.0
> the GAC are OK, I´ve changed FirebirdDDEXprovider.reg and and it to
> registry, but DDEX dosen´t work. Any idea?
>
> If I uninstall all (VS2005, sdk….) could be work?
Do you have VS
Hi,
I´ve VS2005 profesional, .NET SDK 2, I´ve instaled FirebirdClient 2.0.0 the
GAC are OK, I´ve changed FirebirdDDEXprovider.reg and and it to registry,
but DDEX dosen´t work. Any idea?
If I uninstall all (VS2005, sdk
.) could be work?
thanks
-
31 matches
Mail list logo
