You are a genius :)The following code (while not elegent) works!/// IntPtr lib1 = IntPtr.Zero; IntPtr lib2 =
IntPtr.Zero; IntPtr lib3 = IntPtr.Zero; IntPtr lib4 = IntPtr.Zero; Int
Carlos,I used the following code to load the embedded firebird
server. I works very well on Firebird-1.5.2.4731_embed_win32.
However, when I try to load the Firebird-2.0.0.12710-0_embed_win32,
It will not load at all. While version 2 of Firebird is still Beta, it is
nearing final releas
Carlos,I used the following code to load the embedded firebird server. I works very well on Firebird-1.5.2.4731_embed_win32. However, when I try to load the Firebird-2.0.0.12710-0_embed_win32, It will not load at all. While version 2 of Firebird is still Beta, it is nearing final release and I
Hello:
> Carlos,
>
> I am delighted to learn that I CAN use the embeded server. Please
> forgive the ignorance associated with my pervious posting.
>
> I will learn how to use LoadLibrary at once. Is there any code that
> you can point me to that will shorten the learning curve?
>
> Thanks agai
Carlos,I am delighted to learn that I CAN use the embeded server. Please forgive the ignorance associated with my pervious posting.
I will learn how to use LoadLibrary at once. Is there any code that you can point me to that will shorten the learning curve?Thanks again for you helpMarvOn 7/29/0
Marvin Cook wrote:
> The embedded server is unusable currently-- at least in my opinion.
> Is there no way we can implement the original intent which was to put
> the fbembed.dll in the application folder. I realize that everyone is
> volunteer and that I am not able to contribute, but I sure
Hello:
> The embedded server is unusable currently-- at least in my opinion.
> Is there no way we can implement the original intent which was to put
> the fbembed.dll in the application folder. I realize that everyone is
> volunteer and that I am not able to contribute, but I sure would like
Jeri,The embedded server is unusable currently-- at least in my opinion. Is there no way we can implement the original intent which was to put the fbembed.dll in the application folder. I realize that everyone is volunteer and that I am not able to contribute, but I sure would like to have the em
On 26.7.2006 12:38 Scott Price wrote:
> Just Curious: Can the fbembed.dll contents not be converted to the
> managed world?
Maybe, something, who knows. Probably not. There's a lot of C\C++ specific
"features" which will be not easy to do in C#.
IMHO this isn't a good idea. fbembed.dll is defa
Hello:
> It doesn't work *now* in mono or linux :)
If you mean v2.0 yes, but because mono has no complete ado.net 2.0
support ( i think the 2.0 sources should build now using mono from svn )
--
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Vigo-Spain
--
Carlos,>> i don't like to do so in the provider itself as it will not work for mono on linuxIt doesn't work *now* in mono or linux :)If we could get it to work in Windows, it would help a lot of people.
MarvOn 7/26/06, Carlos Guzmán Álvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello:> What about put the path
Michele Lepri wrote:
Scott Price wrote:
Just Curious: Can the fbembed.dll contents not be converted to the
managed world?
The fbembed.dll is the entire database engine ! :)
It should be compile (and tested .. etc..) in managed c++ : (it's
possibile? i don't know.)
And
On 26.7.2006 12:27 Michele Lepri wrote:
> Jiri Cincura wrote:
>> What about put the path part as some configuration switch/ConnString
>> parameter, so every could set path where to find library, without
>> recompiling.
>>
> The problem is that the [DllImport(..)] attribute accept only constant
Hello:
> What about put the path part as some configuration switch/ConnString
> parameter, so every could set path where to find library, without recompiling.
>
> OR
>
> Before setting DllPath make some test in system directory, local directory,
> etc.
Michele Lepri has told yet the reason why th
On 26.7.2006 14:12 Michele Lepri wrote:
> It should be compile (and tested .. etc..) in managed c++ : (it's
> possibile? i don't know.)
I don't think so. There's a lot of pure C++ unsafe constructs, that it will
fail.
And as I also said (hum, mail has stucked somewhere on SF, hope it'll
arrive
Scott Price wrote:
> Just Curious: Can the fbembed.dll contents not be converted to the
> managed world?
The fbembed.dll is the entire database engine ! :)
It should be compile (and tested .. etc..) in managed c++ : (it's
possibile? i don't know.)
And of course managed code is a bit slower the u
Jiri Cincura wrote:
> What about put the path part as some configuration switch/ConnString
> parameter, so every could set path where to find library, without recompiling.
>
The problem is that the [DllImport(..)] attribute accept only constant
string in its parameter.
> OR
>
> Before setting
Just Curious: Can the fbembed.dll contents not be converted to the
managed world?
Regards,
Scott :)
Jiri Cincura wrote:
On 26.7.2006 10:27 Michele Lepri wrote:
I solve it, by recompile del provider with this change:
in the FbClient class of the Embedded namespace, change the
On 26.7.2006 10:27 Michele Lepri wrote:
> I solve it, by recompile del provider with this change:
> in the FbClient class of the Embedded namespace, change the line from
> public const string DllPath = "fbembed";
> to
> public const string DllPath =
> "x:\absolute_path_with
Marvin Cook wrote:
> Carlos,
>
> It would be nice to be able to put fbembed.dll in the same directory
> as the executeable.
Hi all :)
I'm worry it isn't a provider's problem: it is a M$ problems i think.
When you make a pinvoke, i don't know why, the system need more that
only read permission on
Carlos,It would be nice to be able to put fbembed.dll in the same directory as the executeable.MarvOn 7/24/06, Carlos Guzmán Álvarez <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hello:
What features do you think the provider lacks and needsto be implemented in future versions ??One thing that i think that will be ni
Hello:
What features do you think the provider lacks and needs
to be implemented in future versions ??
One thing that i think that will be nice is to change the
installer to use Wix, has somebody experience with it ??
Another is to see if there are something of the new features
of Firebird 2.0 t
22 matches
Mail list logo
