On 8/4/07, Mercea Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jiri
>
> I take a look at sln file and I see reference only to project
> files("FirebirdSql\Data\FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient.csproj") and not to
> all files in projects. This could be a minimal modification, if it will.
>
> It's just a thou
essage-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Jiri Cincura
> Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2007 9:13 PM
> To: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers
> Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Update of Visual Studio
> solition/project fi
On 8/4/07, Mercea Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can't be made a 'copy' of sln file? Like
> FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient2008.sln!
> Like that it can be open with both VS !!!
Hoe to sync adding/removing/moving etc. files in solution? ;)
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (Microsoft Student Partner)
http:
Hello:
> Can't be made a 'copy' of sln file? Like
> FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient2008.sln!
> Like that it can be open with both VS !!!
Web can but with that we will need to mantain two sets of
solution/project files.
-
Th
ent: Saturday, August 04, 2007 12:16 PM
> To: firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Firebird-net-provider] Update of Visual Studio
> solition/project files on svn trunk
>
> Hello:
>
> I'm going to convert the solution/project files to Visual Studio 20
On 8/4/07, Carlos Guzmán Álvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I'm going to convert the solution/project files to Visual Studio 2008
> Beta 2( with compilation against the .NET Framework 3.5 ), does somebody
> have any problem with that change ?? ( the sources should be buildable
> with .
PROTECTED]>
> Předmět: [Firebird-net-provider] Update of Visual Studio solition/project
> files
> on svn trunk
> Datum: 04.8.2007 11:19:42
>
> Hello:
>
> I'm going to convert the solution/project files to Visual Studio 2008
&g
Hello:
I'm going to convert the solution/project files to Visual Studio 2008
Beta 2( with compilation against the .NET Framework 3.5 ), does somebody
have any problem with that change ?? ( the sources should be buildable
with .net 2.0 using the nant scripts or changing the build options of
the
