Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Membership providers

2007-05-04 Thread sasha
> Ideas: > * FB_something > * FBMemebership_something > * FBM_something I think prefix should be: 1) Short 2) Contain $ (in IB/FB traditions) 3) I think prefix FB is unnecessary because it's clear without it So I propose MP$SOMETHING -

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Membership providers

2007-05-04 Thread le roy arnaud
Hi Jiri, first i think that we should do the script for the firebird 2.0 . > > I'm thinking about adding some prefix to SQL scripts for creating > tables, etc. for membershipshiping. > > Why to do this. >First there's some inconsistency in these scripts. Where > So this would help keep

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] New protocol implementation: Internal namespace changes

2007-05-04 Thread sasha
> 2. > > FirebirdSql.Data.Client.Embedded -> FirebirdSql.Data.Client.Native Thought about this. Can i understand that "native" related to .NET provider, i.e. implemented inside of provider? If so, than here is ambiguity and this is bad namespace and i propose something like FirebirdSql.Data.C

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Membership providers

2007-05-04 Thread Jiri Cincura
le roy arnaud wrote: > Hi Jiri, > > first i think that we should do the script for the firebird 2.0 . I'm working on it. > >> >> I'm thinking about adding some prefix to SQL scripts for creating >> tables, etc. for membershipshiping. >> > > > >> Why to do this. >>First there's some inconsist

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Membership providers

2007-05-04 Thread Jiri Cincura
sasha wrote: > So I propose MP$SOMETHING Looks good, too. -- Jiri {x2} Cincura http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE vers

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] New protocol implementation: Internal namespace changes

2007-05-04 Thread sasha
>> What is version 10 ? Maby Version_1, Version_2, ets... ? > > It's the version of FB Protocol. AFAIK. It's impossible. Newest Interbase server has version 8 and protocol didn't change in each version, so protocol version can't be greater than server version. So i think that "version 10" sou

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] New protocol implementation: Internal namespace changes

2007-05-04 Thread Jiri Cincura
sasha wrote: >>> What is version 10 ? Maby Version_1, Version_2, ets... ? >> >> It's the version of FB Protocol. AFAIK. > > It's impossible. Newest Interbase server has version 8 and protocol > didn't change in each version, so protocol version can't be greater than > server version. So i thi

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] New protocol implementation: Internal namespace changes

2007-05-04 Thread sasha
> Not ODS, but GDS (the protocol version wasn't the right term). Ok, than what GDS has FB 1.0 and FB 1.5 ? - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take co

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] New protocol implementation: Internal namespace changes

2007-05-04 Thread Roman Rokytskyy
>>> What is version 10 ? Maby Version_1, Version_2, ets... ? >> It's the version of FB Protocol. AFAIK. > > It's impossible. Newest Interbase server has version 8 and protocol > didn't change in each version, so protocol version can't be greater than > server version. So i think that "version

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] New protocol implementation: Internal namespace changes

2007-05-04 Thread sasha
> No, that is one byte that is being communicated while establishing the > connection. IB 5.x had wire protocol version 9, IB 6.x, FB 1.x, FB 2.0, > IB 7.x (and very likely IB 2007) have protocol version 10. FB 2.1 > supports protocol versions 10 and 11. > > Client talking wire protocol 10 is n

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Membership providers

2007-05-04 Thread le roy arnaud
>> So I propose MP$SOMETHING > > Looks good, too. > Yes so for tables : MemberShip Proprider : MP$ Role Provider : RP$ Profile Provider : PP$ and the same for proc ? - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Downl

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] New protocol implementation: Internal

2007-05-04 Thread Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Hello: > No, that is one byte that is being communicated while establishing the > connection. IB 5.x had wire protocol version 9, IB 6.x, FB 1.x, FB 2.0, > IB 7.x (and very likely IB 2007) have protocol version 10. FB 2.1 > supports protocol versions 10 and 11. > > Client talking wire protocol

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] New protocol implementation: Internal

2007-05-04 Thread Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Hello: > Thought about this. Can i understand that "native" related to .NET > provider, i.e. implemented inside of provider? No, native means that it will use some "native" firebird client dll (fbembedded, fnclient, gds32, ... ) -

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Membership providers

2007-05-04 Thread Jiri Cincura
le roy arnaud wrote: >>> So I propose MP$SOMETHING >> >> Looks good, too. >> > > Yes so for tables : > > MemberShip Proprider : MP$ > Role Provider : RP$ > Profile Provider : PP$ > > and the same for proc ? OK. Ill update names with creating FB2.0 scripts. -- Jiri {x2} Cincura http://blog.v

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] New protocol implementation: Internal

2007-05-04 Thread sasha
> No, native means that it will use some "native" firebird client dll > (fbembedded, fnclient, gds32, ... ) Ok. Seems my english is quite bad :-) - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Membership providers

2007-05-04 Thread Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Hello: > What do you think? Looks fine to me - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] New protocol implementation: Internal

2007-05-04 Thread Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Hello: > Ok. Seems my english is quite bad :-) Maybe using the Native term isn't as accurate as it could be but, as the pure C# GDS implementations are under the Managed namespace i think it's clear enough ;) - This SF.net e

[Firebird-net-provider] Wix Installer

2007-05-04 Thread Carlos Guzmán Álvarez ™
Hello: I have updated yesterday the Wix installer sources in the svn trunk. It looks as working while it provides only basic funcionality :) Hope to improve it a little over the next days. -- Un saludo Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain http://carlosga.wordpress.com --

[Firebird-net-provider] Migrating to .Net 2.0

2007-05-04 Thread Ramprasad Gourishetty
Hi, Presently our windows application is on .Net 1.2 and Firebird 2.0 environment. We are planning to upgrade our .Net environment to 2.0. Please let me know if any show stoppers. Thanks, -Ram - This SF.net email is

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Membership providers

2007-05-04 Thread Jiri Cincura
BTW do you think, that prefix should be each for every provider or same for all ASP.NET web providers? I vote for same. -- Jiri {x2} Cincura http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com - This SF.net email is