Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Membership providers

2007-05-07 Thread le roy arnaud
> BTW do you think, that prefix should be each for every provider or same > for all ASP.NET web providers? > > I vote for same. > for the tables i think that the same prefix could be a good idea but for sp i think that there are already a prefix ex : MEMBERSHIP_CREATEUSER ROLES_ADDUSERTOROLE P

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Membership providers

2007-05-07 Thread Jiri Cincura
le roy arnaud wrote: > for the tables i think that the same prefix could be a good idea but for sp > i think > that there are already a prefix > ex : > MEMBERSHIP_CREATEUSER > ROLES_ADDUSERTOROLE > PROFILES_GETPROPERTIES We can create a) aliases to keep thinks working b) diff script for SP.

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Membership providers

2007-05-07 Thread Mercea Paul
I would create a upgrade script for new tables! There's not to mouch table to modify applications in month... With VS It could be made in minutes (upgrade from old to new tables) Regards, Paul > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Jiri C

[Firebird-net-provider] Issue with .net provider to work with a Firebird generator

2007-05-07 Thread Kai Bohli
Hi all ! I have an existing table which I cannot change. That is, I cannot create a on before insert trigger on it. I have to know the generator value before insert so I have to run something like this: SELECT gen_id(GEN_WEBOBJECTNR, 1) AS id FROM rdb$database So far so good. Since I ha