[Firebird-net-provider] Trying to use version 2.1 with Mono and MonoDevelop

2009-03-21 Thread Sibylle Koczian
Hello, I'm using Firebird 2.1.2, Mono 2.2-14.1, openSUSE 11.1. The package mono-data-firebird version 2.2-14.1 in the openSUSE Build Service still contains version 1.7.1 of the Firebird .NET provider, which doesn't work with Firebird 2.1. So I got version 1.7.2: Firebird .NET provider

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Trying to use version 2 .1 with Mono and MonoDevelop

2009-03-21 Thread Sibylle Koczian
and MonoDevelop On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 11:01, Sibylle Koczian nulla.epist...@web.de wrote: The project FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient compiles, but gacutil says Failure adding assembly FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient.dll to the cache: Attempt to install an assembly without a strong name. What

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Trying to use version 2 .1 with Mono and MonoDevelop

2009-03-22 Thread Sibylle Koczian
and MonoDevelop On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 14:38, Sibylle Koczian nulla.epist...@web.de wrote: I didn't get any message concerning signing, but from the gacutil message I would think no. I compiled with MonoDevelop and the option was on. How can I check for success? Try to install to GAC. :) I don't

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Mono - changing build dir ective and simplifying builds

2009-03-24 Thread Sibylle Koczian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jiri Cincura disk...@cincura.net Gesendet: 22.03.09 16:34:20 An: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Mono - changing build directive and simplifying

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Error using edmgen or edmgen2

2011-08-24 Thread Sibylle Koczian
Von: Jiri Cincura disk...@cincura.net Gesendet: 23.08.2011 17:16:18 You have to add record into provider factories it to machine.config or app.config. Thank you for your very fast response! I did that and now the provider seems to be found, but I get a new error: Unbehandelte Ausnahme:

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Installing for Use with Visual Studio 2008Professional

2011-11-10 Thread Sibylle Koczian
Ok, I was able to get gacutil to work and I can see FirebirdSql.Data.FirebirdClient in the Assembly folder and also when I use the /L switch in gacutil. I can also connect to a Firebird database in VS2008.What I am unable to do is access the assembly in my code. When I include the following

[Firebird-net-provider] Entity Framework 5, code first: database created, then crash

2012-09-27 Thread Sibylle Koczian
Hello,Im trying to create a Firebird database in a small test application using Entity Framework 5 with Code First, but it doesnt work.Versions of everything:Windows 7 Home Premium, 64 bitFirebird 2.5.1Firebird net provider 2.7.7 (installed in the GAC, correct entries in machine.config)Visual

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Entity Framework 5, code first: database created, then crash

2012-09-28 Thread Sibylle Koczian
You have Migrations turned on, but Migrations are/is not supported (currently).How can I turn off Migrations? I dont want them for the moment. I would have thought using a Database Initializer derived from DropCreateDatabaseIfModelChanges would turn them off, because that seems incompatible with

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Entity Framework 5, code first: database created, then crash

2012-09-30 Thread Sibylle Koczian
Am 28.09.2012 15:01, schrieb Jiri Cincura: Use null as initializer. Thank you, that works. But it means that I can neither create nor change my database schema from the application. Only code first with an existing database is possible, right? Not really a problem, but I'd like to know for

[Firebird-net-provider] No lazy loading?

2014-02-09 Thread Sibylle Koczian
Hello, I can't get lazy loading to work as I think it should. Parts of the problem: Entity Framework 6.0.2, Firebird ADO.NET provider 4.1.0.0 (Entity Framework 6), Visual Studio 2012 Professional, Firebird 2.5.2, Windows 7. Database server on localhost. Two related tables: motherdata, fields

Re: [Firebird-net-provider] No lazy loading?

2014-02-09 Thread Sibylle Koczian
Am 09.02.2014 15:52, schrieb Jiri Cincura: Show us the code. Ok: --- Model classes: class CHILDDATA { public int CHILDID { get; set; } public int MOTHERID { get; set; } public string CHILDNAME { get; set; } public virtual MOTHERDATA Mother { get; set; } }