> Any suggestions?
To see any difference you need a lot of data and slow connection.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
--
___
Firebird-net-provider mailing list
F
I've tried compression on a local and remote FB3 database and am not seeing
any difference using compression or Packet/Fetch size.
Do I have settings correct: On server: WireCompression = true
connection string: initial catalog=<>;compression=True;data source=<>;port
number=3051;role name=Office;
> was almost half; eg without compression 6 seconds vs 3.4s with
> compression.
Yes. It also highly depends on data.
> Increasing the PacketSize and FetchSize to maximum 32767 also has a large
> positive impact on transfer time over internet connection.
Honestly I'm thinking about removing these
And Thanks for testing BTW.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
--
___
Firebird-net-provider mailing list
Firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.
I have run my application's test suite on Firebird 3 with and without
compression and all seems OK.
Verified it's using compression by looking at the server version string
returned by connection (ends with P13:Z).
Have also run tests with compression on high latency connection on database
hosted o
Hi *,
anybody testing the compression:
http://blog.cincura.net/233572-compression-support-in-firebirdclient-beta/
?
If not, there's no point in holding the beta. I'll just release it and
let's see what happens [1]. I can't test it much more myself.
[1]: As it's said. You need to break an egg to
