On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 12:37:57 +0200
Kjell Rilbe kjell.ri...@datadia.se wrote:
Working with FB 2.5 on Windows 64 bit, how does Nbackup level 0
perform compared to a high-performance copy utility like FastCopy?
I'm asking because my DB is 80+ Gbyte and both the database and the
backup are
The query is
select [some columns]
from MYTABLE
where FIELDONE= 2 and FIELDTWO 2
order by [some columns]
Most of the time most records have FIELDONE = 2 and FIELDTWO = 2, so
this query is looking for what are normally a small number of
exceptions, and one of my objectives is to
my procedure code is as follows.
CREATE PROCEDURE SP_GET_MINIWEB_EVENTS (
MINIWEB_NAME NAME,
LANGUAGE_CODE LANGUAGE_CODE )
RETURNS (
EVENT_ID ID,
EVENT_DATE Date,
EVENT_TIME Time,
TITLE EVENT_TITLE,
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION,
PRICE MONEY,
VENUE VENUE,
ADDRESS
We recently moved a virtual server with a Firebird 1.5 database server (Linux
x64 Super Server) from one host to another. We have seen this in the past,
although rare (maybe once a month) and a server service restart fixes it.
But now we are seeing it daily. This is from the firebird.log
Dmitry,
Tuesday, October 8, 2013, 2:37:57 PM, you wrote:
KR Working with FB 2.5 on Windows 64 bit, how does Nbackup level 0
KR perform compared to a high-performance copy utility like FastCopy?
as I see on my desktop nbackup -b 0 is 2-3 times slower than lock/file
copy/unlock. I think
