Sean,
Sorry, but I thought it was in the context.
2017-02-07 12:09 GMT-03:00 'Leyne, Sean' s...@broadviewsoftware.com
[firebird-support] :
>
>
> Luke
>
> > I would like to add a sub-topic in this discussion: currently, I'm using
> the
> > nbackup tool to run
Luke
> I would like to add a sub-topic in this discussion: currently, I'm using the
> nbackup tool to run full/incremental backup. I'll have to update the Linux box
> from CentOS 5.7 (2011) to Ubuntu 16.04 (current LTS). Considering both has
> Firebird 2.5.x, is there any issue related to
Hi folks,
I would like to add a sub-topic in this discussion: currently, I'm using
the nbackup tool to run full/incremental backup. I'll have to update the
Linux box from CentOS 5.7 (2011) to Ubuntu 16.04 (current LTS). Considering
both has Firebird 2.5.x, is there any issue related to
Thanks Lester,
Due to the TA+ Software not doing what we want completely, I have already
written a web front end to the database which performs quickly (as
expected) but that's from a FreeBSD client (either to Windows or FreeBSD
Firebird server), so it must be something on the Windows (10) client
07.02.2017 9:14, Luke Crooks l...@solentwholesale.com [firebird-support] wrote:
> When running the 2.5 server on our Windows DC and having clients access from
> the local
> network, performance was very slow (almost unusable).
System HDD on DC has write cache forcefully disabled. Put database
07.02.2017 3:51, Dmitry Yemanov dim...@users.sourceforge.net [firebird-support]
wrote:
> can be overridden by API user)
That's exactly what I wanted to know, thanks.
--
WBR, SD.
On 07/02/17 08:14, Luke Crooks l...@solentwholesale.com
[firebird-support] wrote:
> When running the 2.5 server on our Windows DC and having clients access
> from the local network, performance was very slow (almost unusable). We
> are using a safescan product (Time Attendance +) which uses a
Thanks everyone, I needed to make the file transportable.
Separate question...
When running the 2.5 server on our Windows DC and having clients access
from the local network, performance was very slow (almost unusable). We are
using a safescan product (Time Attendance +) which uses a firebird