Re: [firebird-support] ezSQL/Wordpress

2017-03-09 Thread Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk [firebird-support]
On 09/03/17 11:23, 'Alan McDonald' a...@meta.com.au [firebird-support] wrote: > I use ezSQL with Firebird > Excellent, as long as you use my version :-0 > Happy to give it to you Yes please - thought someone would have used it ;) > I use it in conjunction with ez_results - grid browser - my versio

RE: [firebird-support] ezSQL/Wordpress

2017-03-09 Thread 'Alan McDonald' a...@meta.com.au [firebird-support]
I use ezSQL with Firebird Excellent, as long as you use my version :-0 Happy to give it to you I use it in conjunction with ez_results - grid browser - my version - also you can have I use it for a mortgage loan tracker system (a business environment) not a cms with lots of pictures and formatted

[firebird-support] ezSQL/Wordpress

2017-03-09 Thread Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk [firebird-support]
I've picked up a client who has his website on wordpress which is MySQL only. The database is only 60Mb as a raw SQL dump but still took the best part of an hour to restore via 'mysql-workbench' so not the best response for backup between machines. Now I though ezSQL supported Firebird? I'll clone

Re: [firebird-support] Re: firebird 3.0 ten times slower than 2.5 ?

2017-03-09 Thread Michal Kurczabinski michk...@gmail.com [firebird-support]
Something was wrong with database file.fdb , even after gbak restore. I deleted file for FB 3.X and recreate new database with FB 3.0.2. Now times are similar to FB 2.5. FB_3.0.2 seems to be slighty faster than 3.0.1. now: //3.0.1 SQL> select count(*) from t1; PLAN (T1 NATURAL) Current memory

Re: [firebird-support] FIREBIRD WITH JHIPSTER

2017-03-09 Thread Mark Rotteveel m...@lawinegevaar.nl [firebird-support]
On 2017-03-09 05:28, kyilintu...@yahoo.com [firebird-support] wrote: > Can i connect Firebird with Jhipster > because jhipster didn't show i can use firebird db This question would be more on topic on the Firebird-java mailinglist. However,I would guess that you are better off asking this on a j

Re: [firebird-support] Re: firebird 3.0 ten times slower than 2.5 ?

2017-03-09 Thread Mark Rotteveel m...@lawinegevaar.nl [firebird-support]
On 2017-03-08 11:30, Michal Kurczabinski michk...@gmail.com [firebird-support] wrote: > Thanks for your answer, > > perhaps problem is in jaybird-3.0.0-beta-3 used to connection to fb 3. > > My fb25 client is jaybird-2.2.12 and works fine. When comparing performance of two systems, it is better

[firebird-support] Re: firebird 3.0 ten times slower than 2.5 ?

2017-03-09 Thread hv...@users.sourceforge.net [firebird-support]
---In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, wrote : > In my box in isql mode ( win7_x64, dedicated ssd drive for databases) > default db configuration > > is still difference between 2.5 and 3.0:for select first 100 * > (now over 100% of time fb 2.5) > > > //2.5 > SQL> select count(*) fr

Re: [firebird-support] Re: firebird 3.0 ten times slower than 2.5 ?

2017-03-09 Thread hv...@users.sourceforge.net [firebird-support]
---In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, wrote : > In my box in isql mode ( win7_x64, dedicated ssd drive for databases) > default db configuration > > is still difference between 2.5 and 3.0:for select first 100 * > (now over 100% of time fb 2.5) Try Firebird 3.0.2 snapshot build,