Re: [firebird-support] Replication of Firebird Databases (meany to one)

2013-12-13 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Andy, The way to know if a DB is accessible (online, and if the customer network can reach you - can not be interconnected networks) is to make a small application with a connection and attempting to connect. With VB6, at this link, you have an explanation of how to do such application.

Re: AW: AW: AW: [firebird-support] difficult question

2013-12-10 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Olaf, Stil for this problem, there is a possible solution. If you have only one user at each time, and if the user have the possibility of deleting only the last that have been inserted, you can use a delete trigger, that will renew the value of the generator (the next value that will be

Re: AW: [firebird-support] difficult question

2013-12-06 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Olaf, Du sagst, I habe ein Form und ein SubForm !!! May I ask you wich development enviroment are you using for the front-end application ? I see this kind of application building as having been built with MsAccess !!! Because I work with VB, C# and Delphi, and I found this only with the

Re: AW: AW: [firebird-support] difficult question

2013-12-06 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Vorgang in den neuen verschmolzen in welchem der Kunde übereinstimmt.   Danke für deine Hilfe, viele Grüße nach Brasilien.   Von:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com [mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com] Im Auftrag von Tupy... nambá Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Dezember 2013 12:05 An: firebird-support

Re: AW: AW: [firebird-support] difficult question

2013-12-06 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Dear mrs.Ann, Thanks for you remembering, excuse me for losing the focus. Mr.Olaf is using almost no code in the application, he is working data-bound. If he was using triggers, he could do it more easily yet, with generators. And he has almost no control about the lock, because he is using

Re: AW: [firebird-support] difficult question

2013-12-05 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Olaf, If you deliver us: -the create table of the involved tables (including all created keys, generators, a.s.o.); -some real data of the involved tables (specially for the cases when the problem happens); you will help people to help you. May be also the procedures involved in the data

Re: [firebird-support] can stored proc./ trigger write to another DB ?

2013-10-01 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Hi, Peter, Read http://www.firebirdfaq.org/faq16/. May be this can help you in any way to resolve (or not) your problem. Good luck, Roberto Camargo. From: peter_...@yahoo.com peter_...@yahoo.com To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, October 1,

Re: [firebird-support] GBak Backup Restore Problem

2013-06-26 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
.   Roberto Camargo.   From: Alexandre Benson Smith ibl...@thorsoftware.com.br To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 9:40 PM Subject: Re: [firebird-support] GBak Backup Restore Problem Roberto, Em 25/6/2013 17:07, Tupy... nambá escreveu

[firebird-support] GBak Backup Restore Problem

2013-06-25 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Dear Friends, We have a strange problem with GBak. We make a backup with gbak and then a restore, also with the same. We have a table with 60 rows where a not null type SmallInt column has 0 (zero) as content. When restoring, GBak returns null for this column. As this column is not null,

Re: [firebird-support] GBak Backup Restore Problem

2013-06-25 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Backup Restore Problem Hello, I think you have a row with null value. The option is update table set column = 0 where column is null and then try to backup restore. I have seen this issue when changing columns from null to not null and you have rows in the table. 2013/6/25 Tupy... nambá

Re: [firebird-support] GBak Backup Restore Problem

2013-06-25 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Hi, Dmitry,   Thanks for you response.   No one has changed this table. At most, as a not null column, someone could have change it to another value, but not to null. And no one changed it´s validation rule (as not null). This is discarded.   We repeated the action = we take the DB, checked the

Re: [firebird-support] GBak Backup Restore Problem

2013-06-25 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Backup Restore Problem Em 25/6/2013 16:23, Tupy... nambá escreveu: Dear Friends, We have a strange problem with GBak. We make a backup with gbak and then a restore, also with the same. We have a table with 60 rows where a not null type SmallInt column has 0 (zero) as content. When

Re: Re[2]: [firebird-support] GBak Backup Restore Problem

2013-06-25 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Dmitry,   Yes, the problem seems incredible. If I heard it from someone else, I would also have difficult to believe on that. But this is as it is !   I will not repeat (ooops, I am already in the way !) that the source DB (for the backup) is ok. And the backup, as only could be, really has the

Re: [firebird-support] GBak Backup Restore Problem

2013-06-25 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Restore Problem Thanks, Looks like it is working now.  Appreciate your guidance   - Original Message -   From: Tupy... nambá   To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com   Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 2:23 PM   Subject: [firebird-support] GBak Backup Restore Problem       Dear Friends

[firebird-support] about system table RDB$TRIGGERS

2013-06-15 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Dear friends,   Opening the table RDB$TRIGGERS, I saw many rows where the column RDB$TRIGGER_SOURCE is empty (null or an empty string). And the related tables doesn´t present these triggers.   I ask you: -Are these rows at RDB$TRIGGERS useless ? -May I delete these rows ? -If I delete these

Re: [firebird-support] about system table RDB$TRIGGERS

2013-06-15 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
: Re: [firebird-support] about system table RDB$TRIGGERS On 15-6-2013 15:20, Tupy... nambá wrote: Dear friends, Opening the table RDB$TRIGGERS, I saw many rows where the column RDB$TRIGGER_SOURCE is empty (null or an empty string). And the related tables doesn´t present these triggers. I

[firebird-support] Restore not recreating some foreign keys

2012-09-05 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Dear sirs,     These days, when restoring a backup of us, I noted that some foreign keys have not been recreated at a new copy of a DB.   I don´t know exactly when this happens = if the backup itself is generated without these faulting FK´s or if the fail happens at the DB recreation process.  

Re: [firebird-support] Not visible columns

2012-08-15 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
I don´t know why, but I send a doc with pictures showing this, and it has been removed from my message. From: Tupy... nambá anhangu...@yahoo.com To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com firebird-support@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 8:24 AM

Re: ***SPAM*** [firebird-support] Not visible columns

2012-08-15 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
les...@lsces.co.uk To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 8:53 AM Subject: Re: ***SPAM*** [firebird-support] Not visible columns Tupy... nambá wrote: I have a table whose columns are showed as not existing, at designers (as at EMS SQL Studio or ErWin) and also

[firebird-support] Re: Not visible columns

2012-08-15 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Subject: Re: ***SPAM*** [firebird-support] Not visible columns Tupy... nambá wrote: Lester, Below, the DDL command used to build the table. CREATE TABLE RH_CARGOS (     ID_CARGO INTEGER NOT NULL,     DESCRICAO VARCHAR(70) CHARACTER SET WIN1252 DEFAULT '' NOT NULL COLLATE WIN1252,     STATUS INTEGER

Re: [firebird-support] Not visible columns

2012-08-15 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
suggestion.   Thanks, Mark. Roberto Camargo. From: Mark Rotteveel m...@lawinegevaar.nl To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 8:40 AM Subject: Re: [firebird-support] Not visible columns On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 04:36:16 -0700 (PDT), Tupy

Re: [firebird-support] Re: Not visible columns

2012-08-15 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
-support] Re: Not visible columns On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 05:23:09 -0700 (PDT), Tupy... nambá anhangu...@yahoo.com wrote: Excuse me.   The only column wich is showed, is the Id_Cargo. The others are not showed at the DDL returned by the EMS and at designers. Did you try: * Restarting EMS and/or designer

Re: [firebird-support] Re: Not visible columns

2012-08-15 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Martijn,   I found the same problem running a reverse engineering at ErWin 4.1.4 with ODBC.   Best regards, Roberto Camargo. From: Martijn Tonies m.ton...@upscene.com To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 9:40 AM Subject: Re:

Re: [firebird-support] Re: Not visible columns

2012-08-15 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
columns On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:01:50 -0700 (PDT), Tupy... nambá anhangu...@yahoo.com wrote: Lester,   I was sure that nothing was wrong with my DDL command, because at the same DB I created a RH_Cargos2 with the rest identical and the table was created without problems.   You used my script

Re: [firebird-support] Slow query with like '%xxx%' clause

2012-07-13 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Wenn man die Vorschlage aus Herrn Gödde folgen wird, man kann ein Googler bauen. d.h., wenn man insert oder update macht, dann eine Tabelle mit Suchwörte und Index wird aktualiziert.. stimmt das ?   This will need a complete change in the conception - this is really the only way to get

Re: [firebird-support] How to limit the number of concurrent users to a database

2012-06-14 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Signore Fulvio Senore,   If the problem really is to limit the simultaneous connections, if after each query, you close the connection, this will by his self assure that the simultaneously connected users will be the minimum. And will bring other benefits, as minimizing net traffic.   As

[firebird-support] Copy of the current db not updating generators

2012-05-31 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Dear sirs,   At our company, we use a copy of the production db as development db, for many reasons.   When we do that, we make a phisycal copy of the fdb file.   We observed that, when we make this copy, the generators are not updated, what forces us to update manually the development

Re: RES: [firebird-support] Copy of the current db not updating generators

2012-05-31 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
: [firebird-support] Copy of the current db not updating generators To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, May 31, 2012, 4:10 PM On Thu, 31 May 2012 04:25:02 -0700 (PDT), Tupy... nambá anhangu...@yahoo.com wrote: Ok, thanks. This is well known.   Then I ask = restoring the db

RE: RES: [firebird-support] Copy of the current db not updating generators

2012-05-31 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Alan,   yes, FORCED WRITES is checked.     --- On Thu, 5/31/12, Alan McDonald a...@meta.com.au wrote: From: Alan McDonald a...@meta.com.au Subject: RE: RES: [firebird-support] Copy of the current db not updating generators To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, May 31, 2012, 4:26

Re: RES: [firebird-support] Copy of the current db not updating generators

2012-05-31 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Rotteveel m...@lawinegevaar.nl Subject: Re: RES: [firebird-support] Copy of the current db not updating generators To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, May 31, 2012, 4:56 PM On Thu, 31 May 2012 14:29:41 +0200, Hannes Streicher hstreic...@gmx.de wrote: Hello Tupy... nambá, what

Fw: Re: RES: [firebird-support] Copy of the current db not updating generators

2012-05-31 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Or, according to An Harrison´s explanation, the generators had not been updated due to not have been commited --- On Thu, 5/31/12, Tupy... nambá anhangu...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Tupy... nambá anhangu...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: RES: [firebird-support] Copy of the current db not updating

Re: Fw: Re: RES: [firebird-support] Copy of the current db not updating generators

2012-05-31 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
06:43:14 -0700 (PDT), Tupy... nambá anhangu...@yahoo.com wrote: Or, according to An Harrison´s explanation, the generators had not been updated due to not have been commited Even then, it would still show (older) values from production, not from your previous test database. On what platform

RE: Re: RES: [firebird-support] Copy of the current db not updating generators

2012-05-31 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tupy... nambá Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 3:43 PM To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com Subject: Fw: Re: RES: [firebird-support] Copy of the current db not updating generators   Or, according to An Harrison´s explanation, the generators had not been updated due to not have been

Re: [firebird-support] Re: why Blob is so slow ?

2012-04-20 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
, April 20, 2012, 10:13 AM --- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Ann Harrison aharrison@... wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Tupy... nambá anhanguera@...wrote: But, having many NFE (as many as the transactions), don´t you agree that these BLOB´s will be a great source

Re: [firebird-support] why Blob is so slow ?

2012-04-19 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
, 2012, 6:42 PM Hi Roberto, Em 19/4/2012 08:52, Tupy... nambá escreveu: Alexandre, At my point of view, I prefer avoid using BLOB fields. First of all, because these kind of field are not indicated for searches of any kind (most of them are pictures). Second, because normally they have

Re: [firebird-support] why Blob is so slow ?

2012-04-19 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
MSSQL has two commands of the DBCC that allow to do defragmentation. The defragmentation is not a garbage collection, but putting all parts of an object (file or columns, hanging of the level - disc or DB) side by side, in a way that the reading of data will be almost fast, because all data

Re: [firebird-support] question about copyright law

2011-12-15 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Olaf,   I understand what you mean and Mark left it very clear about the no existence of this situation with Firebird.   The question is that, according to the german culture, there is over and over the worry about rights. And, still according to the german point of view, there is no warranty

Re: [firebird-support] question about copyright law - Email found in subject

2011-12-15 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Sean,   I think the same way as you, but I told that as the only way to have no concerns about this possibility.   And below, Helen Borrie speaks about this concern. Since the concern exists, the possibility exists. And, as one of Murphy´s law say, if it´s very difficult to something happens,

[firebird-support] Importing with a Date type column

2011-10-27 Thread Tupy . . . nambá
Dear mates,   I´m experiencing problems trying to import a date column to a Firebird db.   I used many possibilities, but with none of them I got to import this column.   I also tried FBExport but the orientations were not enough to resolve.   Does someone also have experienced this problem and