Thanks Sudheer Palaparambil for such elaborate explanation.
I am surely going to evaluate this since it seems to be promising. This week we
are collecting requirements From client and decide which, where and How tables
are to be replicated. Today we discussed gross level requirements which
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Thomas Steinmaurer ts@... wrote:
Pls have a look at the open source project
http://symmetricds.codehaus.org/ for synchronization. I have been using
this
for the last 2 years
with Firebird database. This works fantastically. You can sync
Hi,
SymmetricDS is an asynchronous data replication software package that
supports multiple subscribers
and bi-directional synchronization. It uses web and database technologies to
replicate tables between
relational databases, in near real time if desired. The software was
designed to scale for
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, samcarletonscarleton@... wrote:
raja_s_patil,
Someone else seemed to already have replied with the core questions you
asked, but there is something you stated which I am finding out in my world
is a HUGE question and possible show stopper:
-:
Sam wrote:
...
Take a look at the Synchronization Example at the bottom of this
link: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/sync/bb821992 It explains the
basic concept of how Sync Framework syncs the data. The whole key to
it is the Update Tick Count which is database wide. In the
Microsoft world
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Dmitry Kuzmenko kdv@... wrote:
Hello, raja_s_patil!
Saturday, October 8, 2011, 9:37:06 AM, you wrote:
r client wants to stick to FB at Branches for sure. But for centralized
r database they have doubt that whether it will sustain the volume of 10
