--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, crizz11 crizz11@... wrote:
is there a 64 bit version of rfunc for 64 bit linux?
Today i found a 64bit version of rfunk, which I've compiled before couple of
years.
Then I was unable to get it working on other machines, probably because of
missing
Hello,
There is a maintained fork version of rfunc
http://www.assembla.com/wiki/show/audfl_rfunc
Regards,
Alexey Kovyazin
IBSurgeon (www.ib-aid.com)
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
mailto:firebird-support%40yahoogroups.com, crizz11 crizz11@...
wrote:
is there a 64 bit version
Hi,
When I try to restore a backup done in a 2.5 firebird server to a 2.1
firebird server, I get the following error message:
gbak:transportable backup -- data in XDR format
gbak: ERROR:Expected backup version 1..8. Found 9
gbak:Exiting before completion due to errors
Isn't it possible
When I try to restore a backup done in a 2.5 firebird server to a 2.1
firebird server, I get the following error message:
gbak:transportable backup -- data in XDR format
gbak: ERROR:Expected backup version 1..8. Found 9
gbak:Exiting before completion due to errors
Isn't it
04.07.2012 20:56, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
Are you using gbak from 2.1 against a 2.5 server and I hope you don't
use any new/specific things from 2.5?
Backward backup-restore is unlikely to succeed regardless.
Dmitry
04.07.2012 20:56, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
Are you using gbak from 2.1 against a 2.5 server and I hope you don't
use any new/specific things from 2.5?
Backward backup-restore is unlikely to succeed regardless.
Has this changed for the combination 2.1/2.5? AFAIK people successfully
did
Did you tried to use 2.1 gbak against 2.5 server to produce the gbk ?
see you !
Em 4/7/2012 15:59, Aldo Caruso escreveu:
To restore, I am using gbak 2.1 against a 2.1 server, but reading a
*.fbk backup file that was created using a 2.5 server.
AFAIK I'm not using specific things from 2.5
Good idea, but it is unfeasible for me because the server is remote on
Internet (with very high latency), so I have to create the back ups on
the server, download the file and apply it to my local machine (which
has firebird 2.1)
Thanks,
Aldo
El 04/07/12 16:04, Alexandre Benson Smith
El 04/07/12 16:04, Alexandre Benson Smith escribió:
Did you tried to use 2.1 gbak against 2.5 server to produce the gbk ?
At 07:11 AM 5/07/2012, Aldo Caruso wrote:
Good idea, but it is unfeasible for me because the server is remote on
Internet (with very high latency), so I have to create the
Good idea, but it is unfeasible for me because the server is remote on
Internet (with very high latency), so I have to create the back ups on the
server, download the file and apply it to my local machine (which has firebird
2.1)
You could copy the v2.1 GBAK executable onto the remote
Thanks for your idea.
Aldo
El 04/07/12 16:49, Leyne, Sean escribió:
Good idea, but it is unfeasible for me because the server is remote on
Internet (with very high latency), so I have to create the back ups
on the
server, download the file and apply it to my local machine (which
has
I use FB 2.01 in external USB drive connected to the server for about 3-4
years. No problem at all, I think FB 2.5 won't be a problem too.
Currently, using FB 2.5 on a RAM Disk (in server) for a better speed.
Thanks for the answer!! If memory serves, I think I read somewhere a post from
Are you sure you are not mixing it with using the database on Pen Drives ?
Em 4/7/2012 19:10, Sergio escreveu:
I use FB 2.01 in external USB drive connected to the server for about 3-4
years. No problem at all, I think FB 2.5 won't be a problem too.
Currently, using FB 2.5 on a RAM Disk (in
Are you sure you are not mixing it with using the database on Pen Drives ?
Hi Alexande! thanks for the answer!
May be... I'm not sure... But in any case, what would be the difference in
having the database file on an USB HDD and a Pen Drive?
Or it's just a matter of space or performance?
On my experience :
1) USB HDD : more reliable, more speed and more space.
2) Pen Drive : more compact.
3) RAM Disk : highest speed but risky and less space. Do not use it unless you
aware of the risk. Runs on a dedicated PC (no other programs run on this pc,
only database server and OS),
Hello All,
To let you know our opinion (from the point of view as recovery products
and services company):
On my experience :
1) USB HDD : more reliable, more speed and more space.
USDB HDD can be used only for backups. Database should be on RAID1/5/10
(according to your budget).
2)
Hi ,
Could you please let me know for the syntax in FOR XML AUTO, ELEMENTS
in SQL , what is the firebird compliance
Thanks,
Mahesh Pratihari
Sonata Software Limited
Phone : +91 80 3097 1527
Mobile : +91 99808 37446
www.sonata-software.com http://www.sonata-software.com
Could you please let me know for the syntax in FOR XML AUTO, ELEMENTS
in SQL , what is the firebird compliance
This is Microsoft SQL Server specific. There is nothing similar built-in
into Firebird. There are tools out there which can help you to export
data to XML.
--
With regards,
Thomas
18 matches
Mail list logo
