On Feb 17, 2015, at 7:26 AM, Svein Erling Tysvær
svein.erling.tysv...@kreftregisteret.no [firebird-support]
firebird-support@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Could Common Table Expressions or Derived Tables bring any advantages?
I suppose you could use a combination of the two suggestions:
[good
Sorry, you must all be really bored with these, but I just can't get my
head round it.
We're looking to upgrade our (Linux) operating system, and with that is
likely to come an upgrade from 32 bit Firebird 2.1 Superserver to 64 bit
Firebird 2.5, but what architecture?
We need more performance
Hi,
we have a problem with applications of third party suppliers. We provide a
database for data exchange between our system and a third party system. It
often occurs, that the third party suppliers leave transactions open without
committing them. This leads of course to a transaction diff and
Hi,
we have a problem with third part systems connection to our DB. Actually we
provide a database for data exchange between our system and third party systems.
The problem is, that sometimes the third party systems leave transactions open.
Of course this leads to a transaction diff, ending in
Why?? Why does that have to be a failure?? Why can't Firebird just
ignore it??
Is there any switch to turn off this behaviour??
(I've got some immensely complicated query generation code which, it now
appears, can occasionally include a common table expression in the query
that isn't
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:41:56 +, Tim Ward t...@telensa.com
[firebird-support] firebird-support@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Why?? Why does that have to be a failure?? Why can't Firebird just
ignore it??
Is there any switch to turn off this behaviour??
(I've got some immensely complicated
On 17/02/2015 09:44, Mark Rotteveel m...@lawinegevaar.nl
[firebird-support] wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:41:56 +, Tim Ward t...@telensa.com
[firebird-support] firebird-support@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Why?? Why does that have to be a failure?? Why can't Firebird just
ignore it??
Is there
