Hi Folks,
I am searching for a Macintosh OS X solution which supports .gdb database files
from the Hewlett Packard HP 200LX Palmtop.
I understand that Firebird can be installed on OS X, but need to know if there
might still be support for the .gdb files produced by the 200LX.
(I belong to
Larry,
I am searching for a Macintosh OS X solution which supports .gdb
database files from the Hewlett Packard HP 200LX Palmtop.
I understand that Firebird can be installed on OS X, but need to know if
there might still be support for the .gdb files produced by the 200LX.
(I belong to an
On 07.04.2015 08:16, Vishal Tiwari vishuals...@yahoo.co.in
[firebird-support] wrote:
Then what could be the best way to reduce the database size?
All suggestions are appreciated.
Hej Vishal
played around a little bit, unable to reproduce your problem.
Even after setting some blobfields
How do I know which directory the remove.sh file is in? Can I find it from
within the Finder?
How do I find it using Terminal?
How do I change directories to get into the directory that the file is in?
I tried it out and it said the following:
Ryans-MacBook-Pro:~ ryanashton1$ ./remove.sh
Launchctl
/Library/LaunchDaemons/org.firebird.gds.plist: Could not find specified service
Remove Framework
Remove Receipt
Remove /tmp/firebird
Can the question be rephrased as you being interested in which sets are
identical, Elias? If I understand things correctly,
I would assume double negation to be the simple answer you're looking for:
with tmp(id) as
(select distinct id from CRITICALPARAMVALS)
select t.id, t2.id
from tmp t
join
Ok, used the +0 and worked.
On v1.56 I was used with setting up a high granularity data column (col04Int -
part of the primary key) with a True/false (0/1) type of column
(ColDetSmIntFlag) to boost the selectivity of the index
IXColDetSmIntFlag. I kept the index with that configuration for a
On 07 Apr 2015 08:51:22 -0700, andrew_s_...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
firebird-support@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to upgrade an app to v2.54 from v1.56 but there are some
queries that aren't planning the way they should.
I've been changing the query and trying to
On Apr 8, 2015, at 10:05 AM, andrew_s_...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
firebird-support@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Let's see when histograms come to the party, it'll make things more
interesting for sure. G
Histograms may be less useful in Firebird than you might think, unless there's
a
Hi Mark,
Yes, I did a Backup/Restore and updated all the index statistics to give the
engine the best chances possible for the select...
Thanks.
Andrew
I tried it out and it said the following:
Ryans-MacBook-Pro:~ ryanashton1$ ./remove.sh
Launchctl
/Library/LaunchDaemons/org.firebird.gds.plist: Could not find specified service
Remove Framework
Remove Receipt
Remove /tmp/firebird
Then the sh file has done nearly all its job...
the comments
Hi Set,
(I assume you have optimized poorly performing queries with Fb 1.5 long ago,
rather than been waiting for the upgrade).
Yes.
If you compare new, unoptimized queries between 1.5 and 2.5, odds are that
you would conclude that 2.5 are better.
I have very high expectations for that.
In a table called Steps, I have the following fields:
ID, B4Me, Dsc,
-ID field contains a unique ID for each record
-B4Me contains the ID of some other record in the table that MUST appear in a
result set, BEFORE this record. B4Me may be null. This is called the B4Me
order.
-Records
Hello Ann,
Firebird 1.5 considered the index a good candidate, even if you only matched
the first part. In later, smarter versions, it recognizes that the first part
alone is not very good.
I did change the index to only the boolean 1/0 field... then I changed back
adding a part of the
14 matches
Mail list logo
