Hello,
Executing the following in both, dialect 1 and 3:
select cast(current_timestamp as varchar(30))from rdb$database
results in a string with a different date/time format. At least on
Windows with Firebird 2.5 64-bit.
Dialect 1: 7-DEC-2015 20:29:12.3820
Dialect 3: 2015-12-07 20:31:07.2280
> On 8-12-2015 09:52, Thomas Steinmaurer t...@iblogmanager.com
> [firebird-support] wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Executing the following in both, dialect 1 and 3:
>>
>> select cast(current_timestamp as varchar(30))from rdb$database
>>
>>
>> results in a string with a different date/time format. At least
Hi Rudi.
Look at this
http://www.janus-software.com/fbmanual/manual.php?book=admin=23
Consider to change DefaultDbCachePages in firebird.conf. You should
read about this, because it depends if you use super server, classic or
super classic.
DatabaseGrowthIncrement is a parameter that
Hi Rudi,
You did not provide all required information to give you a reasonable
answer.
At least, post fb_lock_print -d output.
Regards,
Alexey Kovyazin
Try HQbird now! www.hqbird.com
I've used FB for years with ISO8859_1 charset and collation.
Now I designing a new DB for a big app update in FB3 and wonder about this
charset and collation.
For test purposes I am using UTF8 and UNICODE_AI_CI and I like that I can now
don't have to worry about casing comparisons nor
I've used FB for years with ISO8859_1 charset and collation.
Now I designing a new DB for a big app update in FB3 and wonder about this
charset and collation. My goal is to avoid having to UPPER everything for
comparison searches.
For test purposes I am using UTF8 and UNICODE_AI_CI and I
On 12/8/15 2:26 PM, r...@seedsbydesign.com [firebird-support] wrote:
>
> I've used FB for years with ISO8859_1 charset and collation.
>
> Now I designing a new DB for a big app update in FB3 and wonder about
> this charset and collation.
>
> For test purposes I am using UTF8 and UNICODE_AI_CI and
Guten Tag r...@seedsbydesign.com [firebird-support],
> Here are my questions:
> 1. Is only one byte used for storage for english and spanish?
NO plain englisch will still be one Byte but spanisch (the accented n ) will
be multiple bytes
> 3. Is there any downside to using UTF8 and
My bad, should read more carefully.
Andrew Zenz
From: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 8 December 2015 6:12 PM
To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Subject: AW: [firebird-support] string