Re: [firebird-support] Re: UPDATE to same record causing heavy disk I/O

On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Dmitry Yemanov dim...@users.sourceforge.net [firebird-support] wrote: > 24.12.2015 05:31, 'Leyne, Sean' wrote: > > > > With today's unlimited availability of disk space and silly-low cost per > GB for storage, would an argument

Re: [firebird-support] Bad performance of Firebird in Windows Server 2012

[firebird-support] Re: UPDATE to same record causing heavy disk I/O

24.12.2015 05:31, 'Leyne, Sean' wrote: > > With today's unlimited availability of disk space and silly-low cost per GB > for storage, would an argument to dispense with the delta and simply store a > full copy of the record (not including BLOB) be worthy of discussion? It's not about storage

Re: [firebird-support] Bad performance of Firebird in Windows Server 2012

Carlos: Thank you for your answer. I suggested to not configure the server as a domain controller but the person who decide this didn´t want! I already read the article you mention and there is where I found that apparently upgrading to 2.1.5 will solve the problem but I was not sure. So

Re: [firebird-support] Numeration without hole, Is right Before Insert Trigger?

Also, take a look at this ancient document that used to be the standard answer to people asking the same question as yours: http://ibobjects.com/docs/ti_AuditableSeries.ZIP HTH, Set 2015-12-22 20:26 GMT+01:00 Ann Harrison aharri...@ibphoenix.com [firebird-support]

[firebird-support] Bad performance of Firebird in Windows Server 2012

Hi guys: I have an application developped in Delphi that uses Firebird Superserver 2.1.4.18393. It is installed in a Windows network. During many years, the server had Windows Server 2003 and everything worked fine. Some time ago they changed it temporarily to another PC with Windows 8.1.

Re: [firebird-support] Bad performance of Firebird in Windows Server 2012