Re: [firebird-support] Forced writes on Linux?

2016-01-17 Thread Ann Harrison aharri...@ibphoenix.com [firebird-support]
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Tim Ward t...@telensa.com [firebird-support] wrote: > I know the folklore around forced writes > > - turning forced writes on is safer > Not exactly folklore. Firebird doesn't have a journal but instead depends on careful

Re: [firebird-support] When to use Firebird 3 Classic

2016-01-17 Thread Thomas Steinmaurer t...@iblogmanager.com [firebird-support]
> On 17-1-2016 00:07, Köditz, Martin martin.koed...@it-syn.de > [firebird-support] wrote: >> is there still a reason to use the Classic mode with Firebird 3? Since >> there is real SMP support with SuperServer I don’t think there can be >> advantages with ClassicServer. > > The main advantage of

Re: [firebird-support] When to use Firebird 3 Classic

2016-01-17 Thread Mark Rotteveel m...@lawinegevaar.nl [firebird-support]
On 17-1-2016 00:07, Köditz, Martin martin.koed...@it-syn.de [firebird-support] wrote: > is there still a reason to use the Classic mode with Firebird 3? Since > there is real SMP support with SuperServer I don’t think there can be > advantages with ClassicServer. The main advantage of course is

Re: [firebird-support] When to use Firebird 3 Classic

2016-01-17 Thread Steve Wiser st...@specializedbusinesssoftware.com [firebird-support]
>From an IT operations side it is so nice and easy to run top on linux and see all of the processes for classic. For superserver and superclassic that is all mostly hidden in threads for a single process and you can't terminate a single thread through the OS tools in the case of an emergency.