[firebird-support] Re: Migrating from Super Classic FB 2.5.2 to SuperServer FB 3.0 could have a problems

2016-05-01 Thread trsk...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
Hi, Tested again with FB 2.5.1 & FB 2.5.5, apparently, this is not a problem from FB 3.0, but it was already appeared since FB 2.5. Same machine, database, query & engine, SC FB 2.5.1 & SC FB 2.5.2 runs a lot faster than FB 2.5.5 & FB 3.0. Regards, Anton

[firebird-support] Create or Alter Procedure: Token Unknown doing a Replace...

2016-05-01 Thread ho...@agencybusys.com [firebird-support]
FB 2.14 - Delphi 2007 - IBDAC TIBCScript Although I'm certain this is not a Delphi problem, I've included a copy of the commands used to create the SQL. Those commands work in FlameRobin, and in IBExpert. I used both to create working DDL, which I copied into my delphi program. Any help or

[firebird-support] Re: Migrating from Super Classic FB 2.5.2 to SuperServer FB 3.0 could have a problems

2016-05-01 Thread Dmitry Yemanov dim...@users.sourceforge.net [firebird-support]
01.05.2016 19:49, trsk...@yahoo.com wrote: > > This is the Query plan from SS FB 3.0 > > PLAN (GET_STCK NATURAL) This is just a different output for select from procedure GET_STCK, v3.0 does not show all its internals as v2.5 did. You'd better compare per table performance counters

Re: [firebird-support] Re: Migrating from Super Classic FB 2.5.2 to SuperServer FB 3.0 could have a problems

2016-05-01 Thread Thomas Steinmaurer t...@iblogmanager.com [firebird-support]
Hi, > This is the Query plan from SS FB 3.0 > > PLAN (GET_STCK NATURAL) > > and here is the Query plan from SC FB 2.5.2 > > PLAN (G_T3 NATURAL)(M_TT INDEX (RDB$PRIMARY2))(A INDEX (IDX_M_GD3))(A > INDEX (IDX_M_GD3))SORT (JOIN (B INDEX (TM_D), A INDEX (T2_T1), C INDEX > (RDB$PRIMARY25), D INDEX

[firebird-support] Re: Migrating from Super Classic FB 2.5.2 to SuperServer FB 3.0 could have a problems

2016-05-01 Thread trsk...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
Hi, This is the Query plan from SS FB 3.0 PLAN (GET_STCK NATURAL) and here is the Query plan from SC FB 2.5.2 PLAN (G_T3 NATURAL)(M_TT INDEX (RDB$PRIMARY2))(A INDEX (IDX_M_GD3))(A INDEX (IDX_M_GD3))SORT (JOIN (B INDEX (TM_D), A INDEX (T2_T1), C INDEX (RDB$PRIMARY25), D INDEX (RDB$PRIMARY21),

[firebird-support] Re: Migrating from Super Classic FB 2.5.2 to SuperServer FB 3.0 could have a problems

2016-05-01 Thread trsk...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
Hi, About Db cache, found the problem. Now I could set Db Cache per database at 2 GB (16384 x 131072), try to set at 4GB (16384 x 262144), no error on gfix, but it just crashed when tried to connect, no error message shown. Regards, Anto.

Re: [firebird-support] Migrating from Super Classic FB 2.5.2 to SuperServer FB 3.0 could have a problems

2016-05-01 Thread liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl [firebird-support]
Hi, 1. will be good to see this query plans 2. will be good to see exact error message 3. also check your db by gfix –validate –full regards, Karol Bieniaszewski From: mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2016 8:35 AM To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com Subject:

[firebird-support] Migrating from Super Classic FB 2.5.2 to SuperServer FB 3.0 could have a problems

2016-05-01 Thread trsk...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
Hi all, Just migrating from SC FB 2.5.2 to SS FB 3.0 (both in Win x64), i found a few problems : 1) Query that runs about 2-3 secs in SC FB 2.5.2, runs minutes in SS FB 3.0 Query is something like this : Select a.col1,b.col1 from tbl1 a, tbl2 b where a.id = b.id and b.id in (select c.id from