Re: [firebird-support] Deleting records and deadlocks

2015-12-02 Thread setysvar setys...@gmail.com [firebird-support]
Den 02.12.2015 13:24, skrev Ann Harrison aharri...@ibphoenix.com [firebird-support]: >> On Dec 2, 2015, at 6:35 AM, Tim Ward t...@telensa.com [firebird-support] >> wrote: >> >> What about if two concurrent transactions are both trying to *delete* >> the *same*

Re: [firebird-support] Deleting records and deadlocks

2015-12-02 Thread Ann Harrison aharri...@ibphoenix.com [firebird-support]
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Tim Ward t...@telensa.com [firebird-support] wrote: > > > Yes I do know it's not a real deadlock, I was using the word because I > knew it would be understood and because, I'm pretty sure?, I've seen it > in one of the relevant

Re: [firebird-support] Deleting records and deadlocks

2015-12-02 Thread Tim Ward t...@telensa.com [firebird-support]
Thanks for the replies. Don't worry folks, I'm not going to try this, I was just curious. Yes I do know it's not a real deadlock, I was using the word because I knew it would be understood and because, I'm pretty sure?, I've seen it in one of the relevant error messages. -- Tim Ward

[firebird-support] Deleting records and deadlocks

2015-12-02 Thread Tim Ward t...@telensa.com [firebird-support]
I know that if two concurrent transactions try to make changes to the same record at the same time one of them gets a deadlock. What about if two concurrent transactions are both trying to *delete* the *same* record at once? - from the point of the view of the user's objectives there's no

Re: [firebird-support] Deleting records and deadlocks

2015-12-02 Thread Ann Harrison aharri...@ibphoenix.com [firebird-support]
> On Dec 2, 2015, at 6:35 AM, Tim Ward t...@telensa.com [firebird-support] > wrote: > > What about if two concurrent transactions are both trying to *delete* > the *same* record at once? - from the point of the view of the user's > objectives there's no