great thanks
to make sure I've got this right
starting with the same database I can do either
a) gbak with gc
b) gbak without gc and gfix -sweep
and I will have the same final result
Extending this further, how can identify which tables contain (or did
contain) the garbage.
Number
On Apr 9, 2015, at 11:01 AM, Nick Upson n...@telensa.com [firebird-support]
firebird-support@yahoogroups.com wrote:
to make sure I've got this right
Not quite.
starting with the same database I can do either
a) gbak with gc
Won't advance the oldest active
b) gbak without gc and
great thanks
to make sure I've got this right
starting with the same database I can do either
a) gbak with gc
b) gbak without gc and gfix -sweep
and I will have the same final result
Extending this further, how can identify which tables contain (or did
contain) the garbage.
As well as
Hi
I'd like to do my backup without gc and then do the gc separately -
is there any effective difference between doing gbak with gc and
gbak without gc and then gfix -sweep
Nick Upson, Telensa Ltd, Senior Operations Network Engineer
direct +44 (0) 1799 533252, support hotline +44 (0) 1799
On Apr 5, 2015, at 11:23 AM, Nick Upson n...@telensa.com [firebird-support]
firebird-support@yahoogroups.com wrote:
is there any effective difference between doing gbak with gc and
gbak without gc and then gfix -sweep
The only differences (that I can think of) are caused by concurrent
