Subject:SV: [Fis] Science, Philosophy and Information. An Alternative
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 20:32:04 +0100
From: Søren Brier email@example.com
To: joe.bren...@bluewin.ch joe.bren...@bluewin.ch, Pedro Clemente
Søren -- Your science without philosophy is what we have mostly been
having since the industrial revolution. In this period sciences has mostly
been the handmaid of engineering and technology, following Francis Bacon's
recommendation. Now that our culture has captured and partly destroyed
How does one measure the synergy among three discourses?
That is an interesting question within information theory (as part of both
science and philosophy).
From: fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On
Behalf Of Pedro C.
I guess I am at a loss to see them as separate
discourses. Especially in the domain of Information.
Contrary to what Stan said, I think that many of
the major advances in science from Statistical
Mechanics, to Relativity Theory to Quantum
Mechanics did and continue to have a major
Could it be so that Philosophy of Statistical Mechanics does not make much
sense without Philosophy of Cognition
and philosophy of the rest?
Could it be so that what we need is Natural Philosophy as it was before it has
fallen apart into specialist sciences?
When you say philosophers do you mean theorists? And, if not, what
distinguishes the two?
What would a philosophical component of information theory look like? Does
such a component simply speak about the existential status of information? Is
there some epistemology involved? Are there
Step Eleven of* Learn to Count in Twelve Easy Steps*
What has happened previously (pls. see http://32o2m99e.utawebhost.at)
The circumstances under which Genetics can take place are regulated by
order rules that govern both places to [kinds of] amounts and [kinds of]