Dear Loet, Joe and all,
We are reaching again the question of “meaning” as attached to information.
Let me remind a few points addressed more or less explicitly in some previous
posts:
1) A “meaning” does not exist by itself. It is a “meaningful information”
(Shannon type information) related
Folks,
Joseph wrote:
Two aspects of the exchange between Koichiro and Loet merit attention: 1) Loet
said that his point of replacing “why” with “what” did not seem necessary to
him. In my mind, however, when Koichiro refers to “what is communicated by
what”, he is insisting on not
