> On 2015-10-14, at 12:38 PM, Marcus Abundis wrote:
>
>> RE Mark Johnson's post of Thu Oct 1 09:47:13 on Bateson and imagination
Two quick remarks:
1. It's not at all clear to me that C is subsumptive of B.
2. I would lobby for Shannon/Bayesian relationships as an intermediary
between A. and B
Maybe I've missed something, but the subsumption I mentioned
(referring to Bateson) was not between A, B and C: these are
co-existent interacting dynamics as I understand them, and certainly a
very rigorous and powerful generative model.
I was worrying about subsumption of Bateson's "imagination"
