Dear Plamen,
I fully agree with your assessment of the downside of dataism. The necessary
counterbalance, though, cannot in my opinion come through using binary
operators (in the sense of Burgin/Brenner) such as capital and currency, where
the movement of ideas is involved. There is an implied
Dear Alberto, Pedro, and FIS Colleagues,
I think you got the message. All in all, an effort to
organize scientific/intellectual potential in this forum and others of that
kind into a kind of currency of a much higher value than money and other
material and virtual resources on Earth deserves to
Dear Plamen, Pedro and Collegues,
I am enjoying a lot this forum.
I absolutely foresee Scientific Blockchain as a continuously growing
list of scientific records and contributions (blocks) linked and secured
using cryptography, somehow a kind of peer reviewed process. Would you
be able to
Dear Plamen and Colleagues,
If it can be feasible, I would very much welcome what you propose. Yes, it
would be great developing a general articulation amongst all our exchanges.
Roughly, I feel that a fundamental nucleous of neatly conceptualized
information is still evading us, but outside
Dear Bruno,
In the Vedic Religion - still practiced today - there are many names that
can invoke God,
or different Aspects of Him/Her associated with different Functions of the
Divine.
In India, I constantly (almost weekly) meet people who can attest to that
in different ways,
and tell me
