Dear Bruno:
These distinctions are not to be identified into a single "self" of the
self-reference, but to be dissolved (differentiated) in discourse. They are
carried by the communication in science & technology studies or more broadly
(since including the science/society interface) in the inf
Dear Loet,
Sorry for bumping this old post, but I cannot resist (I tried!) to add
my grain of salt.
On 21 Oct 2015, at 08:37, Loet Leydesdorff wrote:
Self-reference is a key principle in art and humor and it may also
be a key component of the structured coherence in science Pedro and
we
Self-reference is a key principle in art and humor and it may also be a key
component of the structured coherence in science Pedro and we are seeking.
Dear Joseph:
Do not count me in to the "we", please. In my opinion, these "unity of
science" principles are outdated. At issue is to specify
Cari Pedro e Joseph, Cari Tutti,
ho scritto sempre le stesse cose. La conoscenza dell'armonia o l'armonia
della conoscenza รจ basta sulla super-legge dell'informazione (energia della
cultura) o dell'energia (informazione della natura). L'informazione
naturale o termodinamica, genetica, matematica e
Dear Pedro, Dear FISers,
Pedro's note conveys very well the intellectual /Angst/ I and probably also
many of you feel confronted by the complexity of the 'crazy story' which we
are both tellers of and listeners to. Pedro's division into five domains of
knowledge (and knowing) is a very useful
