Dear Hans colleagues,
Thank you for all the exciting comments in the aftermath of the Lecture.
It is the ill-fated of me to be unable to pay the due attention to all
these fast exchanges... Anyhow, during these days I am keeping a few
questions, among them:
--Partition Logic. It is an
Dear All,
I think I have discovered what it was that was bothering me about QBism: it was
only the particular 'detour' through atomic physics that Hans made, that is,
one that requires Bayesian probability to describe its terms (see New Year
Lecture). Here are two key tenets of QBism,
://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ych9gNYJhl=en hl=en
From: Hans von Baeyer [mailto:henrikrit...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2014 11:30 PM
To: Loet Leydesdorff
Cc: Joseph Brenner; Pedro C. Marijuan
Subject: Re: [Fis] Fw: Isms Healing the Subject-Object split
Loet
