-Original Message-
From: boris.sunik
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 10:26 PM
To: 'Krassimir Markov'
Subject: RE: [Fis] Fw: The General Information Theory of Sunik
Dear Krassimir,
Below are my points regarding discussed issues.
Regards,
Boris Sunik
1. I never claimed that computer
is the branch(s) of
algorithm(s) associated with this item.
-Original Message-
From: Krassimir Markov [mailto:mar...@foibg.com]
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 22:32 PM
To: boris.sunik
Subject: Fw: [Fis] Fw: The General Information Theory of Sunik
-Original Message
Dear Krassimir,
Thank you for bringing this document to our attention, for completeness. I
would have wished, however, that you had made some comment on it, putting it
into relation with your own work and, for example, that of Mark Burgin,
which are dismissed out of hand.
From my point of
The document seems extremely confused to me. This is not least because the
author does not appear to present a clear definition of the terms in the title
or the expression of subject in the work. In particular, I can find no
definition of meaning other than the one presented in a quote from
I agree with you both.
The declarative statements (4 statements in 2.4.1 Digital Computer versus
Brain: Are Neurons and bits really that different?) that are the proof of
the entire premise are unable to be proved, have no tests or evidence and
are taken as self evident.
This path is a dead end.
