9gNYJ&hl=en
From: Fis [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On Behalf Of Mark johnson
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 5:59 PM
To: fis@listas.unizar.es
Subject: Re: [Fis] Locality & Five Momenta . . .
Dear FIS colleagues,
I'm curious about why the discussion about momenta matters. Does
;
Sent: 30/10/2015 13:24
To: "Marcus Abundis" <55m...@gmail.com>; "fis"
Subject: Re: [Fis] Locality & Five Momenta . . .
Marcus wrote:
– I find myself thinking Five Momenta must represent five types of localities.
I ask if that “smells right” to you. If so,
Marcus wrote:
– I find myself thinking Five Momenta must represent five types of
localities. I ask if that “smells right” to you. If so, I would think that
“localizing hierarchies” would also be needed. For example, I see: 1)
passive descriptions of Nature (aka natural philosophy, general science)
Loet, thanks for your note (Sat Oct 24) . . . an interesting twist on
things I had not been considering.
John, re (Tue Oct 27) “rigorous connections using the entropy concept . . .
most people don't understand entropy . . . So I haven't published”
– This interests me, as my own work heads in a gen
Dear Marcus,
I think this is a wise question. We must always speak up and seek clarification
when we are concerned about our interpretation of the environment (in which can
be found my posts to FIS) if we are to achieve effective communication (the
exchange of knowledge between apprehending ent
