Hi Pedro
I'm unable to send this list any email.
Regards
Gavin

-----Original Message-----
From: fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On
Behalf Of Pedro C. Marijuan
Sent: Friday, 11 March 2011 10:47 p.m.
To: fis@listas.unizar.es
Subject: [Fis] Social Validation of Knowledge

Dear FISers,

I was intrigued with the recent exchange between James, Jerry and 
others. Taking the central topic --limitations of ancient science, 
particularly Aristotelian one, to develop into modern science-- from 
another angle, my contention is that the main transformations from 
Ancient to Modern science did not concern the "core contents" (e.g., 
logics, mathematics) but the social procedures of knowledge validation. 
"Tribunals" and "witnesses" judging experimental "facts" together with 
an "invisible college" of learned societies and learned journals. Those 
new social procedures arouse and were made possible by a new 
informational vehicle to disseminate knowledge in a new, far more 
efficient way: the printed book. At the stake are the limitations of the 
cognizing individual: the auxiliary "memories" that have been central 
along the knowledge accumulation enterprise: numbers, writing, tablets & 
papyri, codices, printed books, computers... without them, no knowledge 
accumulation possibilities.

The printing press ("the Gutenberg Galaxy", McLuhan dixit) so 
revolutionized the knowledge world that in the first century of its 
existence there were more printed books circulating that handwritten 
ones in the accumulated history of mankind. This phenomenon was behind 
the scientific revolution, and the new social procedure of knowledge 
validation: by "verificatio experimentalis" (with oral "disputatio" 
persisting, but now in the background). In our times, we are living 
another period of intense transformations, and new social procedures 
that have been instantiated around knowledge validation, e.g.: 
"simulatio computationalis", the computer as a cognizing instrument 
itself. The "data deluge", with another words.

These are too rough comments, obviously, and I have cavalierly jumped 
upon the other and more genuine scientific revolution in the 19th 
Century --machine driven. Given that science is finally a modality of 
social "accumulation" (creation, elaboration, validation) of knowledge, 
with very peculiar and stringent standards (so its transformative power 
and prestige), my contention is that some of its main transformations 
along history have had external social causes, very humble ones quite 
often (see for instance the history of the "0" figure).

best wishes

--Pedro

PS. Thanks again to Zhao for his elegant text; I wonder whether we could 
organize a future discussion session focused in the 
humanistic-scientific "fusion" around the informational streak. Let us 
invite Main, Mihir, and also co-ordinate with other artists already in 
fis list --Jim Cogswell, Luis Rico...

-- 
-------------------------------------------------
Pedro C. Marijuán
Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group
Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud
Avda. Gómez Laguna, 25, Pl. 11ª
50009 Zaragoza, Spain
Telf: 34 976 71 3526 (& 6818) Fax: 34 976 71 5554
pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es
http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/
-------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
fis mailing list
fis@listas.unizar.es
https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis



_______________________________________________
fis mailing list
fis@listas.unizar.es
https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis

Reply via email to