[Fis] Fwd: Re: Chuan's reply8 - THE FRONTIERS OF INTELLIGENCE SCIENCE-- Poetic Intelligence amp; its Tangent

2015-03-21 Thread joe.bren...@bluewin.ch
Dear Rafael, Dear Chuan, Dear Pedro and All,
I recall Pedro's comment in his note of 20.3 about the poem of Machado: he said 
it was 'neurophilosophical' as well as impressive as art. Here, Rafael suggests 
two necessarily related domains of the intelligence of poetry and intelligence 
as poetry. 
The principle I see here which justifies further (if need be) our discussion of 
these ideas as part of the Foundations of Information Science is that our 
thinking about them (the domains) involves our moving back and forth between 
them. I suggest that this movement is characteristic of informational processes 
in general and, accordingly, also part of their science. There is a 'logic' 
operative here that should be obvious.
The result is that my only criticism of Pedro :-) is his use of the word 
'tangent' in the title of this sub-track. I think we are at the heart of the 
discussion. We only now perhaps should move back (see preceding paragraph) 
toward a somewhat more formal expression of this form of 
intelligence-information science without denaturing it.  
Thank you and best wishes,
Joseph
 
Message d'origine
De : raf...@capurro.de
Date : 21/03/2015 - 00:32 (PST)
À : zh...@cdut.edu.cn, pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es, ssal...@binghamton.edu, 
13francesco.ri...@gmail.com, joe.bren...@bluewin.ch
Cc : fis@listas.unizar.es
Objet : Re: Chuan's reply8 - THE FRONTIERS OF INTELLIGENCE SCIENCE-- Poetic 
Intelligence  its Tangent
  

  
  

Dear Chuan,
  
  thanks you for your delightful message.
  Maybe we should think about the difference between intelligence of
  poetry and intelligence as poetry.
  best regards
  Rafael


  
Dear Pedro, you are right, the IFS dose not
like attachment. The mail of 3-20 is returned. Let me use a
smaller jpg file and try again.  
  
 Chuan
  
  
2015-3-21




-- 
Prof.em. Dr. Rafael Capurro 
Hochschule der Medien (HdM), Stuttgart, Germany
Capurro Fiek Foundation for Information Ethics 
(http://www.capurro-fiek-foundation.org)
Distinguished Researcher at the African Centre of Excellence for Information 
Ethics (ACEIE), Department of Information Science, University of Pretoria, 
South Africa.
Chair, International Center for Information Ethics (ICIE) (http://icie.zkm.de)
Editor in Chief, International Review of Information Ethics (IRIE) 
(http://www.i-r-i-e.net)
Postal Address: Redtenbacherstr. 9, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
E-Mail: raf...@capurro.de
Voice: + 49 - 721 - 98 22 9 - 22 (Fax: -21)
Homepage: www.capurro.de
  
___
Fis mailing list
Fis@listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis


Re: [Fis] Chuan's reply8 - THE FRONTIERS OF INTELLIGENCE SCIENCE-- an old poem as an echo

2015-03-21 Thread Joshua Augustus Bacigalupi
Greetings All;

I am new to your group, and am moved to contribute by the Machado passage
posted by Pedro.  Never have I read such a concise and eloquent rendering
of how I've come to understand the dynamic physical process of mind and
intelligence.  The poetic focus this last week, and the thread's original
Far East infusion, has been refreshing.  However, I will try to
contribute something towards a more formal expression of intelligence per
Joe Brenner's suggestion.

My own research has led me to a number of realizations, not the least of
which, very generally stated, is that the question of cognition, mind, and
intelligence will only be understood by embracing a paradox of information
- not in the the Shannon sense, but in the significance to organisms sense.

Namely, to be informed, in the sense that an agent's internal structure
re-organizes so as to increase its chance of making significant choices in
its indeterminate environment, is to do two seemingly contradictory things
at once:
1) Re-organize so as to represent, or 'know', distinct objects and events
in the agent's world that are relevant to it, and
2) Re-organize so as to represent, or 'know', the relevant inter-relations
between these objects and events.

And, the crux of the paradox is that these two behaviors are *simultaneous*.
Put very briefly, agents evolved to do this, I suggest, because physical
reality is itself both distinct events and their inter-relations,
*simultaneously*.  Here in lies the numerical intractability of the *n*-body
problem; because, both the barionic masses and their gravitational
attributes co-exist, not as a sequential processes, but as a single unified
dynamic.

It is here where I think this thread's openness to more (w)holistic world
views can be very useful.  Never the less, an *n*-body system, though
numerically intractable, is still formally knowable to within knowable
bounds.  So, there is a both/and outcome, where distinct formalism, the
so-called Western tradition, are employed as tools to both measure and
influence the complex irreducible dynamics of self-adaptive systems.

Wanderer, your footsteps are the road, and nothing more; wanderer, there
is no road, the road is made by walking.

Celestial masses both form and are simultaneously formed by the dynamic
gravitational terrain, an attribute intrinsically of the system.
Similarly, I suggest that brain assemblages of neural, glial, and blood
vessel cells both form and are simultaneously formed by their interstitial
chemistry and fields into and out of complex terrains of mass and energy.
Again, this system is intractable when assessed sequentially.  There is a
physical, and therefore, simultaneous dynamic between so-called parts and
their whole.

By walking one makes the road, and upon glancing behind one sees the path
that never will be again.  Wanderer, there is no road - only wakes upon the
sea.

Amazing image.  A beautiful rendering of a self-efficacious relationship
between the distinct agent(s) and its(their) surroundings at every scale.

Cordially,
Josh

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:29 AM, Pedro C. Marijuan 
pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es wrote:

 Dear FISers,

 Herewith my contribution to the poetic intelligence tangent we have
 entered.
 It is in Spanish, from the great poet Antonio Machado:

 Caminante, son tus huellas
 el camino y nada más;
 Caminante, no hay camino,
 se hace camino al andar.
 Al andar se hace el camino,
 y al volver la vista atrás
 se ve la senda que nunca
 se ha de volver a pisar.
 Caminante no hay camino
 sino estelas en la mar.

 One English translation could say:

 “Wanderer, your footsteps are the road, and nothing more; wanderer, there
 is no road, the road is made by walking. By walking one makes the road, and
 upon glancing behind one sees the path that never will be trod again.
 Wanderer, there is no road-- Only wakes upon the sea.

 I find it quite moving, and extremely complex on its meaning, quite
 phenomenological and deeply neurophilosophical. But above all, impressive.
 Thanks are due to Chuan, Stan, Joseph, Francesco... et al.
 best---Pedro

 Lee todo en: Caminante no hay camino - Poemas de Antonio Machado 
 http://www.poemas-del-alma.com/antonio-machado-caminante-
 no-hay-camino.htm#ixzz3Uv6PQoJo http://www.poemas-del-alma.
 com/antonio-machado-caminante-no-hay-camino.htm#ixzz3Uv6PQoJo
 Francesco Rizzo wrote:

 Caro Joseph e cari Tutti,
 anche se rischio di essere bloccato o frainteso perché non ho voce
 linguistica di moda, nei numerosi interventi precedenti ho sottolineato
 l'importanza della parola composta emo-ra-zionalità, risultato della
 combinazione della intelligenza emotiva e della razionalità
 intellettuale. Nessuna descrizione non poetica della realtà può essere
 completa. Ilya Prigogine ha proposto di adottare nel campo della scienza il
 paradigma della musica. Henri Poincarè ritiene, talvolta, le equazioni o le
 funzione  un museo teratologico ed i modelli paradigmatici una scelta
 convenzionale o di