Messaggio inoltrato
Da: tozziart...@libero.it A: Alex Hankey alexhan...@gmail.com Data:
mercoledì, 04 ottobre 2017, 07:37PM +02:00
Oggetto: Re[2]: [Fis] Heretic
>Dear Prof. Hankey,
>I come from a free country, where everybody can say his own opinion, in
>particular if his
Dear Professor Tozzi,
Might I suggest that you graciously retire from the list,
as you evidently do not wish to participate in what
the rest of us find fascinating topics of discussion.
As a physicist, I have no difficulty in relating to the concept of
'information',
and I am aware of no less
> Dear Fiser??
It is possible to formalize what is information (phenomena, essence and
ontology) with the simplest symbolic system.
??0??1??
??00??01??10??11??
??000??001,111??
??
1.
"Ecological Characteristics of Information and Its Scientific
Dear Pedro and Joseph, Dear FISers,
Physical information;
Psychological information;
Mathematical information;
The difference between the above phenomenon of information and its essence is
the difference between the ancient??modern and the contemporary focus.
Best wishes,
Xiaohui ZOU
in
Thanks Loet, for a very clear and concise exposition of an approach that
I agree with.
I'm curious about your use of the word 'dualistic'. Dualism usually
suggests that there are two aspects to a single phenomenon. As I
interpret your post, you are saying that information and meaning are
Nobody of us is able to provide an operative framework and a single
(just one!) empirical testable prevision able to assess "information".
Dear colleague,
One should not confuse the confusion on the list with the clarity of the
concept information in information theory. This definition is
