Re: [Fis] Answer to the comments made by Joseph

2015-07-23 Thread Gyorgy Darvas
In maintenance of the position by Joseph: I accept all approaches. We must study any phenomenon from different aspects. This does not mean that all actors should study all of the possible aspects, but accept them. According to me, Joe is right. Ontological aspects are as much important as

[Fis] Answer to the comments made by Joseph

2015-07-23 Thread Fernando Flores
Hello everybody: I will answer to the comments made by Joseph and Luis will answer to the comments made by Moisés. Dear Joseph: Thank you for your comments. We are not sure about the usefulness of identifying “information” (order) with “mater”. In this sense we are very carefully to avoid

Re: [Fis] Information Foundation of the Act--F.Flores L.deMarcos

2015-07-23 Thread Jerry LR Chandler
List: This comment is restricted to the proposed use of mathematical structures in context of the social. The mathematical structure of a tree is restricted by the notion of a cycle. A tree is readily converted into a cycle by simply adding a new edge between leaves or joints. The simple

Re: [Fis] Information Foundation of the Act--F.Flores L.deMarcos

2015-07-23 Thread Marcos Ortega Luis de
Dear Moisés, Thank you for your comments. We thought about it but unfortunately we didn't go any further because a characterization is far beyond our mathematical background. In terms of analogies we would have to define a symmetry and a conservation. We may think of a symmetry of time. If we

Re: [Fis] Information Foundation of the Act--F.Flores L.deMarcos

2015-07-23 Thread Joseph Brenner
Dear Fernando and Luis, Your paper is very rich and very serious, and so I hope you will accept my slightly different perspective and see it as a basis for further foundational work, rather than just criticism. I will first make just two comments here: 1. Matter is potentiality, actuality and