[Fis] _ Re: _ Re: _ DISCUSSION SESSION: INFOBIOSEMIOTICS

Dear Mark, 1. The way we think is part of how Nature works. 2. Thought is not separate from our contact with Nature. 3. Concept arises in the integration of thought and percept. 4. Thought is singular in that thought can be the object of thought and this becomes a place where subject and object

[Fis] _ Re: _ Re: _ DISCUSSION SESSION: INFOBIOSEMIOTICS

All -- There is the World, and there is Nature, our model of the world. Nature is based in (usually one kind of) logic, even though there is scant evidence that the world operates only or mostly logically. The evidence that there is is found in successful applications of engineering and

[Fis] _ RE: _ DISCUSSION SESSION: INFOBIOSEMIOTICS

Dear Soren, Thanks for these details on the Peircean approach. You write that ‘the concept of experience and meaning does not exist in the vocabulary of the theoretical framework of natural sciences'. Would you consider the modeling of meaning generation (MGS in previous post) and the linking

[Fis] _ MODERATION NOTE

Participants are kindly reminded that only two messages per week are allowed. BlackBerry de movistar, allí donde estés está tu oficin@ -Original Message- From: Louis H Kauffman Sender: Fis Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 00:18:08 To:

Re: [Fis] _ DISCUSSION SESSION: INFOBIOSEMIOTICS

Dear Soren, In my opinion, there are two issues here (again J ): 1. the issue of non-verbal (e.g., bodily) communication; 2. the meta-biological or transdisciplinary integration vs. the differentiation among the disciplines. Ad 1. Although I don't agree with Luhmann on many things,