1) Let me second to the point Alex raises:
machines, computers, do exchange information. It would be against cultural
conventions to say that the notification that the refrigerator sends to
your phone's app "to-do-list" of the content "milk only 0.5 liter
available" is not an information.
The sign
BUT, in common parlance, computers and mobile phones 'exchange information'
(in the abstract, digital sense) all the time. Including this email.
If you wish to cleanly restrict yourself to semantic content, the the form
of information that I presented to FiS a year ago offers the only
scientifical
24 mars 2017 kl. 16:25 skrev Krassimir Markov
mailto:mar...@foibg.com>>:
Dear Arturo and FIS Colleagues,
Let me remember that:
The basic misunderstanding that non-living objects could “exchange
information” leads to many principal theoretical as well as psychological
faults.
For instance, pho
Dear Arturo and FIS Colleagues,
Let me remember that:
The basic misunderstanding that non-living objects could “exchange
information” leads to many principal theoretical as well as psychological
faults.
For instance, photon could exchange only energy and/or reflections !
Sorry for this n-th m
Dear Lars-Göran, I prefer to use asap my second FIS bullet, therefore it will
be my last FIS mail for the next days.
First of all, in special relativity, an observer is NOT by definition a
material object that can receive and store incoming energy from other objects.
In special relativity
Dear Fisers, a big doubt...
We know that the information of a 3D black hole is proportional to its 2D
horizon, according to the Bekenstein-Hawking equations.
However, an hypotetical observer traveling at light speed (who watches a black
hole at rest) detects a very large black hole horizon, due t
