Dear all,
There are some terms from physics which we use continually and assume
we all know what they mean. I'm taking my cue from Peter Rowland's
physics - see http://anpa.onl/pdf/S36/rowlands.pdf - in asking some
fundamental questions not only about information, but about physics
itself.
1.
Dear Gordana,
On 20 Oct 2017, at 11:02, Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic wrote:
Dear Terry, Bob, Loet
Thank you for sharing those important thoughts about possible
choices for the definition of agency.
I would like to add one more perspective that I find in Pedro’s
article which makes a
Dear Lou, dear Gordanna,
On 22 Oct 2017, at 05:56, Louis H Kauffman wrote:
Dear Krassimir,
Thank you!!
Yours is the most creative resolution of the Barber Paradox that I
have encountered.
Perhaps we can apply it also to the Russell Paradox.
I do not know. Let us think about it.
Another
1. Il figaro autobarbando
The split between the role of the barber and the person of the barber can
be massaged into a split between form and substance.
Like roles are not additive, neither are forms. (A grandfather who is a
neighbour are not 2 persons.)
Like a person can be more (important,
Dear colleagues,
In my opinion, a word like "agency" (or "action") is provided with
meaning within a sentence/statement which is theoretically informed.
Only in a context, a word can become a concept.
The common ground that is assumed in this discussion is the claim that
the generation of
